asterisk users - Feb 2004 - chan_sip support for SIP:Remote-Party-ID, specificallyCLID priva cy

I have the following in my sip.conf entries:

callerid="Anonymous" <8885551212>

This still passes the number for 911, but flags the call as private.  I
believe this will meet your requirements.

Stephen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olle E. Johansson [mailto:oej@edvina.net]
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 10:17 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_sip support for
SIP:Remote-Party-ID,
> specificallyCLID priva cy
> 
> Low, Adam wrote:
> 
> > Hey All,
> >
> > I have a Cisco AS5300 running SIP against an Asterisk server with
> multiple C7940 phones.
> >
> > My issue is that from what I see in chan_sip.c there is no support
for
> the
>  > Remote-Party-ID field in relation to withholding the calling partys
> number.
> 
>  > This is a legal requirement for many countries and although it
doesnt
> appear as an
> 
> Impressed. Does some countries have laws on SIP implementations? Wow.
;-)
> 
> 
> > Is this something planned to be added or perhaps a minor oversight ?
> If it's somethine planned to be added is really up to your (our
someone
> else's)
> willingness to code... :-)
> 
> 
> >
> > Remote-Party-ID:
> <sip:16175881000@212.160.251.37>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
> > Remote-Party-ID:
>
<sip:16175881000@212.160.251.37>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=full
> >
> Could you please point me in direction of standard documents, drafts
or
> documentation of this?
> 
> /O
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Steve Dolloff wrote:
> I have the following in my sip.conf entries:
> 
> callerid="Anonymous" <8885551212>
> 
> This still passes the number for 911, but flags the call as private.  I
> believe this will meet your requirements.
> 
> Stephen
OK.  I was under the impression that the PSAP got their information based on 
ALI/ANI and not from CLID.  Are you telling me that they're looking at CLID?

Also, at least in the testing I've done, the text portion of the CLID string
is ignored by the telco.  They only look at the number and generate the text 
based on what is in their database.  IE; If I tell my asterisk server to set 
my callerID to "test" <my home number> and call someplace, What
I get on the
  CLID display of the phone I dial is "John Fraizer" and my home
number.

Since Powell has stated that we must provide E911 services, I am wondering 
what precisely is going to have to be done to do so with Asterisk.  Routing 
the call to the PSAP when someone dials 911 is the easy part.  Sending all 
of the information they want/need (much more than just CLID and something 
that is regulated) is an alltogether different story.

John

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]