Does anybody have any reason why I should *not* permenantly replace app_voicemail with app_voicemail2? If so, speak now or forever cvs update -D "8/18/2003". Mark
On Monday 18 August 2003 04:06 pm, Mark Spencer wrote:> Does anybody have any reason why I should *not* permenantly replace > app_voicemail with app_voicemail2? If so, speak now or forever cvs > update -D "8/18/2003".Wouldn't that break everybody's dialplans where they would have to replace all occurrences of Voicemail2 with Voicemail and all occurrences of Voicemailmain2 with Voicemailmain? -Tilghman
Go for it! :) On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Mark Spencer wrote:> Does anybody have any reason why I should *not* permenantly replace > app_voicemail with app_voicemail2? If so, speak now or forever cvs update > -D "8/18/2003". > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Hi Mark, Go for it. There is no reason to keep the old one anymore. BR, Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Spencer" <markster@digium.com> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:06 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail2 vs. Voicemail> Does anybody have any reason why I should *not* permenantly replace > app_voicemail with app_voicemail2? If so, speak now or forever cvs update > -D "8/18/2003". > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >