flight 4595 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/4595/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-i386-i386-xl 18 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 4586
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair 7 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. 4586
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking,
including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable:
test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl 18 leak-check/check fail like 4586
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-i386-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen 63fd6f886f49
baseline version:
xen 7b4c82f07281
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Chun Yan Liu <cyliu@novell.com>
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-i386-xcpkern pass
build-amd64 pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl fail
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-i386-i386-xl fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl pass
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair pass
test-i386-i386-pair pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair pass
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair fail
test-amd64-amd64-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-i386-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pv pass
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-amd64-win fail
test-amd64-i386-win fail
test-i386-i386-win fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win fail
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
changeset: 22654:63fd6f886f49
tag: tip
user: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
date: Thu Jan 06 14:25:10 2011 +0000
libxl: Implement libxl_basename()
This patch implements libxl_basename() as a portable replacement
for GNU vs. POSIX basename.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
changeset: 22653:7b4c82f07281
user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
date: Wed Jan 05 23:54:15 2011 +0000
QEMU_TAG update
=======================================commit
99d53fbb69d3e03be61ae10506a304a3d08d792f
Author: Chun Yan Liu <cyliu@novell.com>
Date: Wed Jan 5 23:48:36 2011 +0000
fix ''|'' key display problem in en-us with altgr processing
Commit f95d202ed644 handles altgr-insert problem. Unfortunately, with
that patch, there is a problem in En-us keyboard: ''|''
(bar) cannot be
displayed. After checking keymap files, we found there are two
definitions to "bar" in en-us: bar 0x56 altgr (in
"common") bar 0x2b
shift (in "en-us") First line is actually invalid in en-us
lanuage. The 2nd definition will cover the 1st one.
The previous change in didn''t consider multi-definition case. It
scans
keymap files, if keysym needs altgr, it will records that, after that,
if keysym is pressed but altgr not pressed, it will add an altgr press
opeartion. It is correct if all keysyms are unique and valid. But in
the above multi-definition case, there is problem: when reading bar
0x56 altgr (in "common") it will record altgr needed, but in fact,
that definition won''t be used, it always use the 2nd definition and
won''t need altgr. Then if the keysym is pressed, the code will
still
add an altgr press operation, that will cause problem.
So, if we cannot avoid multi-definition in keymap files, the altgr
flag (whether altgr needed or not) should also be refreshed according
to the 2nd defintion. In the above case, when reading the 1st line, it
records altgr needed; then reading 2nd line, 2nd definition will cover
the 1st, meanwhile the altgr flag should be reset (the 2nd definition
doesn''t need altgr, so altgr flag should be removed.)
Following patch supplements f95d202ed644, and solve the
problem.
Signed-off-by: Chun Yan Liu <cyliu@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel