Keir, is there a reason why schedule.c and timer.c don''t both use the latter, command line controllable value? Also, aren''t the comment and code in vcpu_periodic_timer_work() out of sync with the actual implementation in timer.c in that a timer will never expire early (with timer_slop only being used to set an upper bound on the expiry range)? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 10/02/2010 11:41, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:> is there a reason why schedule.c and timer.c don''t both use the latter, > command line controllable value? > > Also, aren''t the comment and code in vcpu_periodic_timer_work() out > of sync with the actual implementation in timer.c in that a timer will > never expire early (with timer_slop only being used to set an upper > bound on the expiry range)?Yes, true. Thanks for that; it''s now fixed as c/s 20921. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel