All, Though our RC2 testing is still ongoing, I''d like to report the updated bug status here for Xen-3.3.0-rc2 (c/s 18186). So far, test shows 6 P1 bugs got fixed, and there are still 3 P1 bugs open. More detailed test report will be sent out when our testing is finished. Open P1 issues: =============================================1. Guest can not boot up with memory over 2G on IA32PAE host. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1308 2. Guest OS cannot be restored after saving if vncconsole option is listed in guest config. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1309 3. One 32e, hotplug attaching VT-d NIC to guest failed. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1316. Fixed P1 issues: =============================================1. With ioemu-remote, guest cannot be created with qcow image. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1304. 2. Domain0 will crash when wake up from S3 on IA32E. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1305 3. Dom0 hangs when destorying one guest with MSI NIC assigned. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1306 4. VT-d NIC does not work in HVM guest. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1307 5. HVM guest S3 resume can not work http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1310 6. Processor power management does not work in Xen-3.3.0-rc1. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1311 -- haicheng _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 5/8/08 09:39, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@intel.com> wrote:> 1. Guest can not boot up with memory over 2G on IA32PAE host. > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1308I''ll fix this one.> 2. Guest OS cannot be restored after saving if vncconsole option is > listed in guest config. > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1309I can take a look later, but I''ll have to work out what the options are supposed to mean and do first. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser wrote:> >> 2. Guest OS cannot be restored after saving if vncconsole option is >> listed in guest config. >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1309 > > I can take a look later, but I''ll have to work out what the options > are supposed to mean and do first. >Previously, vncconsole=1 was used to identify using vncviewer spawning. But since ioemu-remote does not support vncviewer option any more, `xm create` code path ignores vncconsole option at all; but `xm restore` still looks it as a valid option and pass it as vncviewer to ioemu-remote, which causes qemu exit(1). -- haicheng _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Samuel Thibault
2008-Aug-05 10:08 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Issue list for Xen-3.3.0-rc2 (#18186)
Li, Haicheng, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 17:57:25 +0800, a écrit :> Previously, vncconsole=1 was used to identify using vncviewer spawning.What is the difference with the vncviewer=1 option? Samuel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 5/8/08 10:49, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:> On 5/8/08 09:39, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@intel.com> wrote: > >> 1. Guest can not boot up with memory over 2G on IA32PAE host. >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1308 > > I''ll fix this one.Fixed as c/s 18239. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 5/8/08 10:49, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:>> 2. Guest OS cannot be restored after saving if vncconsole option is >> listed in guest config. >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1309 > > I can take a look later, but I''ll have to work out what the options are > supposed to mean and do first.This was a trivial issue actually. It''s fixed by c/s 18240. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Samuel Thibault wrote:> Li, Haicheng, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 17:57:25 +0800, a écrit : >> Previously, vncconsole=1 was used to identify using vncviewer >> spawning. > > What is the difference with the vncviewer=1 option? > > SamuelIn old xmexample.hvm, there is no vncviewer opiton, only vncconsole option for spawning vncviewer. -- haicheng _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel