Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
2005-May-23 15:18 UTC
[Xen-devel] Please pull xeno-unstable-ia64.bk (now includes VT-i support)
Non-VTI testing passed and I have merged in latest xen.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable changes and tested that too (non-VTI). Keir, please pull bk://xen-ia64.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable-ia64.bk into the xeno-unstable tree. Congratulations to the Intel team for reaching this milestone! Dan> -----Original Message----- > From: Arun Sharma [mailto:arun.sharma@intel.com] > Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 11:49 PM > To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) > Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Rebased xen-ia64 tree with > VT-i support > > Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote: > > So, go ahead and merge it into > > xen-ia64.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable-ia64.bk. > > Please make sure you merge in my latest changes (yesterday) > > which are necessary to accommodate recent changes by Keir in > > the main Xen source tree. When that is done, let me know and > > I will give it one final compile/run test and then get Keir > > to pull it up into xen.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable.bk. > > > > I just pushed some changes to xeno-unstable-ia64.bk. They add support > for the Intel Vanderpool technology for Itanium processor > family (VT-i). > > CONFIG_VTI is disabled by default and needs to be explicitly > turned on > in Rules.mk for those interested in trying it out and having > access to > VT-i capable hardware. > > I also checked in something equivalent to the pci-ioapic > patch for ia64 > and removed swiotlb.c (because Xen will not be involved in PCI DMA). > > -Arun > > >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel