Is there any reason why we are using 2.6.11 in testing and not 2.6.11.8? Just curious. James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> Is there any reason why we are using 2.6.11 in testing and > not 2.6.11.8?No good reason, though its more of a concern for people that generate rpms. If someone submits a patch to look for kernel updates in the current kernel src search path, then I''ll apply it. Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Rik van Riel
2005-May-04 13:48 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] why 2.6.11 and not 2.6.11.8 in testing?
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Ian Pratt wrote:> > Is there any reason why we are using 2.6.11 in testing and > > not 2.6.11.8? > > No good reason, though its more of a concern for people that generate > rpms.It wouldn''t matter for me either way, since rawhide follows the latest code by Linus, not the 2.6.N.Y stable updates ;) -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel