Ivan,
I found the same thing after doing an upgrade a couple of months ago and
mailed this list. Never got a response.
We had to fdisk the shared disks and remount them and restore db from
backup.
Chris Taylor
Sr. Oracle DBA
Unique Solutions
www.unisolinc.com
Office: 336-667-2447 xt. 2242
Cell: 336-262-5545
-----Original Message-----
From: ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:00 PM
To: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
Subject: Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2
Send Ocfs-users mailing list submissions to
ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
ocfs-users-owner at oss.oracle.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Ocfs-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Cannot mount after upgrade OCFS (Ivan Wong)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:45:23 -0700
From: "Ivan Wong" <ivan.wong at e2open.com>
Subject: [Ocfs-users] Cannot mount after upgrade OCFS
To: <ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com>
Message-ID:
<FB46E2D2BC09EC479EE1FA1D930A79D30318FECA at us1e2k2.corp.e2open.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi experts,
We did an ocfs upgrade from:
ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.9-9
ocfs-support-1.0.9-9
ocfs-tools-1.0.9-9
to
ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1
ocfs-support-1.0.10-1
ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1
with below enviroment now:
[oracle at x335-a52 oracle:a52stg04]$ uname -a Linux x335-a52 2.4.9-e.25smp #1
SMP Fri Jun 6 18:11:40 EDT 2003 i686 unknown
[oracle at x335-a52 oracle:a52stg04]$ rpm -qa | grep ocfs
ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1
ocfs-support-1.0.10-1
ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1
After upgrade, we find one of the mountpoint corrupted:
[root at x335-a55 root]# mount /ora02
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1,
or too many mounted file systems
************************************************************************
********
[root at x335-a52 root]# fsck.ocfs /dev/sdb1 fsck.ocfs 1.0.10-PROD1 Fri Mar 5
14:35:41 PST 2004 (build
b5602eb387c7409e9f814faf1d363b5b)
Checking Volume Header...
WARNING: nonzero bytes after the disk header structure
<<<<<<<
corruption
ERROR: structure failed verification, fsck.c, 384 ocfs_vol_disk_hdr
================================minor_version: <INVALID VALUE> 0
major_version: <INVALID VALUE> 2
signature: OracleCFS
mount_point: /ora02
serial_num: 0
device_size: 26843529216
start_off: 0
bitmap_off: 56320
publ_off: 23552
vote_off: 39936
root_bitmap_off: 0
data_start_off: 1368064
root_bitmap_size: 0
root_off: 2416640
root_size: 0
cluster_size: 131072
num_nodes: 32
num_clusters: 204785
dir_node_size: 0
file_node_size: 0
internal_off: 1368064
node_cfg_off: 4096
node_cfg_size: 17408
new_cfg_off: 21504
prot_bits: -rwxr-xr-x
uid: 5550 (oracle)
gid: 5550 (dba)
excl_mount: OCFS_INVALID_NODE_NUM
ERROR: Volume header bad. Exiting, fsck.c, 669
<<<<<<<<
corruption
/dev/sdb1: 2 errors, 0 objects, 0/204785 blocks
************************************************************************
********
We still have 8 more production servers to upgrade to and would definitely
like to avoid/solve this problem. Please advice.
Thanks / regards,
Ivan Wong
Database Administrator
e2Open Inc. (www.e2open.com <http://www.e2open.com/> )
Suite 34.03, Level 34, Menara Citibank
156, Jalan Ampang,
50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
DID: +603 2776 6374 Tel: +603 2776 6300 Fax: +603 2712 9112
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20060726/99beeeb3/att
achment.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ocfs-users mailing list
Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users
End of Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2
*****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20060727/f222ccc9/attachment.html
Figured I would throw this out there, not sure if it applies to your
situation:
Did you guys run fsck.ocfs, per the readme for going up from 1.0.9?
This applies to 1.0.13 as well.
"Running a mix of nodes with 1.0.9 or earlier and 1.0.12
is NOT recommended. So, when upgrading from 1.0.9 or earlier,
please umount all the volumes on all the nodes, before mounting
them with 1.0.12. Please also run fsck.ocfs during the upgrade.
The same restriction does not apply for 1.0.10 or later.
That is, if all the nodes are on 1.0.10 or later, the nodes could
be upgraded to 1.0.12 in a rolling manner."
Bruce
________________________________
From: ocfs-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Chris Taylor
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:09 PM
To: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs-users] Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2
Ivan,
I found the same thing after doing an upgrade a couple of months ago and
mailed this list. Never got a response.
We had to fdisk the shared disks and remount them and restore db from
backup.
Chris Taylor
Sr. Oracle DBA
Unique Solutions
www.unisolinc.com
Office: 336-667-2447 xt. 2242
Cell: 336-262-5545
-----Original Message-----
From: ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:00 PM
To: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
Subject: Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2
Send Ocfs-users mailing list submissions to
ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
ocfs-users-owner at oss.oracle.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Ocfs-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Cannot mount after upgrade OCFS (Ivan Wong)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:45:23 -0700
From: "Ivan Wong" <ivan.wong at e2open.com>
Subject: [Ocfs-users] Cannot mount after upgrade OCFS
To: <ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com>
Message-ID:
<FB46E2D2BC09EC479EE1FA1D930A79D30318FECA at us1e2k2.corp.e2open.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi experts,
We did an ocfs upgrade from:
ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.9-9
ocfs-support-1.0.9-9
ocfs-tools-1.0.9-9
to
ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1
ocfs-support-1.0.10-1
ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1
with below enviroment now:
[oracle at x335-a52 oracle:a52stg04]$ uname -a Linux x335-a52 2.4.9-e.25smp
#1 SMP Fri Jun 6 18:11:40 EDT 2003 i686 unknown
[oracle at x335-a52 oracle:a52stg04]$ rpm -qa | grep ocfs
ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1
ocfs-support-1.0.10-1
ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1
After upgrade, we find one of the mountpoint corrupted:
[root at x335-a55 root]# mount /ora02
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1,
or too many mounted file systems
************************************************************************
********
[root at x335-a52 root]# fsck.ocfs /dev/sdb1 fsck.ocfs 1.0.10-PROD1 Fri Mar
5 14:35:41 PST 2004 (build
b5602eb387c7409e9f814faf1d363b5b)
Checking Volume Header...
WARNING: nonzero bytes after the disk header structure
<<<<<<<
corruption
ERROR: structure failed verification, fsck.c, 384 ocfs_vol_disk_hdr
=================================
minor_version: <INVALID VALUE> 0
major_version: <INVALID VALUE> 2
signature: OracleCFS
mount_point: /ora02
serial_num: 0
device_size: 26843529216
start_off: 0
bitmap_off: 56320
publ_off: 23552
vote_off: 39936
root_bitmap_off: 0
data_start_off: 1368064
root_bitmap_size: 0
root_off: 2416640
root_size: 0
cluster_size: 131072
num_nodes: 32
num_clusters: 204785
dir_node_size: 0
file_node_size: 0
internal_off: 1368064
node_cfg_off: 4096
node_cfg_size: 17408
new_cfg_off: 21504
prot_bits: -rwxr-xr-x
uid: 5550 (oracle)
gid: 5550 (dba)
excl_mount: OCFS_INVALID_NODE_NUM
ERROR: Volume header bad. Exiting, fsck.c, 669
<<<<<<<<
corruption
/dev/sdb1: 2 errors, 0 objects, 0/204785 blocks
************************************************************************
********
We still have 8 more production servers to upgrade to and would
definitely like to avoid/solve this problem. Please advice.
Thanks / regards,
Ivan Wong
Database Administrator
e2Open Inc. (www.e2open.com <http://www.e2open.com/> )
Suite 34.03, Level 34, Menara Citibank
156, Jalan Ampang,
50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
DID: +603 2776 6374 Tel: +603 2776 6300 Fax: +603 2712 9112
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20060726/99beeeb3
/attachment.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ocfs-users mailing list
Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users
End of Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2
*****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20060727/fc53ebd1/attachment-0001.html
Sorry to hear that. We had some problems with the mailserver on oss and may have lost your email in the process. Chris Taylor wrote:> > Ivan, > > I found the same thing after doing an upgrade a couple of months ago > and mailed this list. Never got a response. > We had to fdisk the shared disks and remount them and restore db from > backup. > > > > > Chris Taylor > Sr. Oracle DBA > Unique Solutions > www.unisolinc.com > Office: 336-667-2447 xt. 2242 > Cell: 336-262-5545 > > -----Original Message----- > From: ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com > [mailto:ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:00 PM > To: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com > Subject: Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2 > > Send Ocfs-users mailing list submissions to > ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ocfs-users-owner at oss.oracle.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Ocfs-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Cannot mount after upgrade OCFS (Ivan Wong) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:45:23 -0700 > From: "Ivan Wong" <ivan.wong at e2open.com> > Subject: [Ocfs-users] Cannot mount after upgrade OCFS > To: <ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com> > Message-ID: > > <FB46E2D2BC09EC479EE1FA1D930A79D30318FECA at us1e2k2.corp.e2open.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi experts, > > We did an ocfs upgrade from: > > ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.9-9 > ocfs-support-1.0.9-9 > ocfs-tools-1.0.9-9 > > to > > ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1 > ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 > ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 > > with below enviroment now: > > [oracle at x335-a52 oracle:a52stg04]$ uname -a Linux x335-a52 > 2.4.9-e.25smp #1 SMP Fri Jun 6 18:11:40 EDT 2003 i686 unknown > > [oracle at x335-a52 oracle:a52stg04]$ rpm -qa | grep ocfs > ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1 > ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 > ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 > > After upgrade, we find one of the mountpoint corrupted: > > [root at x335-a55 root]# mount /ora02 > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, > or too many mounted file systems > > > ************************************************************************ > ******** > [root at x335-a52 root]# fsck.ocfs /dev/sdb1 fsck.ocfs 1.0.10-PROD1 Fri > Mar 5 14:35:41 PST 2004 (build > b5602eb387c7409e9f814faf1d363b5b) > Checking Volume Header... > WARNING: nonzero bytes after the disk header structure <<<<<<< > corruption > ERROR: structure failed verification, fsck.c, 384 ocfs_vol_disk_hdr > ================================> minor_version: <INVALID VALUE> 0 > major_version: <INVALID VALUE> 2 > signature: OracleCFS > mount_point: /ora02 > serial_num: 0 > device_size: 26843529216 > start_off: 0 > bitmap_off: 56320 > publ_off: 23552 > vote_off: 39936 > root_bitmap_off: 0 > data_start_off: 1368064 > root_bitmap_size: 0 > root_off: 2416640 > root_size: 0 > cluster_size: 131072 > num_nodes: 32 > num_clusters: 204785 > dir_node_size: 0 > file_node_size: 0 > internal_off: 1368064 > node_cfg_off: 4096 > node_cfg_size: 17408 > new_cfg_off: 21504 > prot_bits: -rwxr-xr-x > uid: 5550 (oracle) > gid: 5550 (dba) > excl_mount: OCFS_INVALID_NODE_NUM > ERROR: Volume header bad. Exiting, fsck.c, 669 <<<<<<<< > corruption > /dev/sdb1: 2 errors, 0 objects, 0/204785 blocks > ************************************************************************ > ******** > > We still have 8 more production servers to upgrade to and would > definitely like to avoid/solve this problem. Please advice. > > > > > Thanks / regards, > > > > Ivan Wong > > Database Administrator > > > > e2Open Inc. (www.e2open.com <http://www.e2open.com/> ) > > Suite 34.03, Level 34, Menara Citibank > > 156, Jalan Ampang, > > 50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia > > DID: +603 2776 6374 Tel: +603 2776 6300 Fax: +603 2712 9112 > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20060726/99beeeb3/attachment.htm > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs-users mailing list > Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users > > > End of Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2 > ***************************************** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs-users mailing list > Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users >
Ah...I thought it unusual to not receive any kind of reply. Chris Taylor Sr. Oracle DBA Unique Solutions www.unisolinc.com Office: 336-667-2447 xt. 2242 Cell: 336-262-5545 -----Original Message----- From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:Sunil.Mushran at oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:42 PM To: Chris Taylor Cc: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [Ocfs-users] Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2 Sorry to hear that. We had some problems with the mailserver on oss and may have lost your email in the process. Chris Taylor wrote:> > Ivan, > > I found the same thing after doing an upgrade a couple of months ago > and mailed this list. Never got a response. > We had to fdisk the shared disks and remount them and restore db from > backup. > > > > > Chris Taylor > Sr. Oracle DBA > Unique Solutions > www.unisolinc.com > Office: 336-667-2447 xt. 2242 > Cell: 336-262-5545 > > -----Original Message----- > From: ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com > [mailto:ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:00 PM > To: ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com > Subject: Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2 > > Send Ocfs-users mailing list submissions to > ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ocfs-users-owner at oss.oracle.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Ocfs-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Cannot mount after upgrade OCFS (Ivan Wong) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:45:23 -0700 > From: "Ivan Wong" <ivan.wong at e2open.com> > Subject: [Ocfs-users] Cannot mount after upgrade OCFS > To: <ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com> > Message-ID: > > <FB46E2D2BC09EC479EE1FA1D930A79D30318FECA at us1e2k2.corp.e2open.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi experts, > > We did an ocfs upgrade from: > > ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.9-9 > ocfs-support-1.0.9-9 > ocfs-tools-1.0.9-9 > > to > > ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1 > ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 > ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 > > with below enviroment now: > > [oracle at x335-a52 oracle:a52stg04]$ uname -a Linux x335-a52 > 2.4.9-e.25smp #1 SMP Fri Jun 6 18:11:40 EDT 2003 i686 unknown > > [oracle at x335-a52 oracle:a52stg04]$ rpm -qa | grep ocfs > ocfs-2.4.9-e-smp-1.0.13-1 > ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 > ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 > > After upgrade, we find one of the mountpoint corrupted: > > [root at x335-a55 root]# mount /ora02 > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, > or too many mounted file systems > > > ********************************************************************** > ** > ******** > [root at x335-a52 root]# fsck.ocfs /dev/sdb1 fsck.ocfs 1.0.10-PROD1 Fri > Mar 5 14:35:41 PST 2004 (build > b5602eb387c7409e9f814faf1d363b5b) > Checking Volume Header... > WARNING: nonzero bytes after the disk header structure <<<<<<< > corruption > ERROR: structure failed verification, fsck.c, 384 ocfs_vol_disk_hdr > ================================> minor_version: <INVALID VALUE> 0 > major_version: <INVALID VALUE> 2 > signature: OracleCFS > mount_point: /ora02 > serial_num: 0 > device_size: 26843529216 > start_off: 0 > bitmap_off: 56320 > publ_off: 23552 > vote_off: 39936 > root_bitmap_off: 0 > data_start_off: 1368064 > root_bitmap_size: 0 > root_off: 2416640 > root_size: 0 > cluster_size: 131072 > num_nodes: 32 > num_clusters: 204785 > dir_node_size: 0 > file_node_size: 0 > internal_off: 1368064 > node_cfg_off: 4096 > node_cfg_size: 17408 > new_cfg_off: 21504 > prot_bits: -rwxr-xr-x > uid: 5550 (oracle) > gid: 5550 (dba) > excl_mount: OCFS_INVALID_NODE_NUM > ERROR: Volume header bad. Exiting, fsck.c, 669 <<<<<<<< > corruption > /dev/sdb1: 2 errors, 0 objects, 0/204785 blocks > ********************************************************************** > ** > ******** > > We still have 8 more production servers to upgrade to and would > definitely like to avoid/solve this problem. Please advice. > > > > > Thanks / regards, > > > > Ivan Wong > > Database Administrator > > > > e2Open Inc. (www.e2open.com <http://www.e2open.com/> ) > > Suite 34.03, Level 34, Menara Citibank > > 156, Jalan Ampang, > > 50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia > > DID: +603 2776 6374 Tel: +603 2776 6300 Fax: +603 2712 9112 > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was > scrubbed... > URL: > http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20060726/99beee > b3/attachment.htm > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs-users mailing list > Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users > > > End of Ocfs-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2 > ***************************************** > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs-users mailing list > Ocfs-users at oss.oracle.com > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20060727/05e00262/attachment.html