Are there known performance issues with using glusterfs on software raid? I've been playing with a variety of configs (AFR, AFR with Unify) on a two server setup. Everything seems to work well, but performance (creating files, reading files, appending to files) is very slow. Using the same configs on two non-software raid machines shows significant performance increases. Before I go a undo the software raid on these machines, can anyone confirm if there are known performance issues with software raid? Or if I should be hunting down other differences between the two environments (there may be other differences such as kernel versions, 64bit vs 32bit, etc.)? In both environments I'm using 1.3.9. Thanks, Matt Brown
Hi Matt: Can I have the detail comfig of your cluster?? like node number, config of client and server ?? and so on. Thanks baggioss 2008/6/12 Matt Brown <mattbrown.lists at lamphost.net>:> Are there known performance issues with using glusterfs on software raid? > I've > been playing with a variety of configs (AFR, AFR with Unify) on a two > server > setup. Everything seems to work well, but performance (creating files, > reading files, appending to files) is very slow. Using the same configs on > two non-software raid machines shows significant performance increases. > Before I go a undo the software raid on these machines, can anyone confirm > if > there are known performance issues with software raid? Or if I should be > hunting down other differences between the two environments (there may be > other differences such as kernel versions, 64bit vs 32bit, etc.)? In both > environments I'm using 1.3.9. > > Thanks, > Matt Brown > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20080612/7659f35d/attachment.html>