bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.netfilter.org
2009-Feb-23  16:22 UTC
[Bug 579] New: iptables --ports argument unknown
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579
           Summary: iptables --ports argument unknown
           Product: iptables
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: i386
        OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: iptables
        AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org
        ReportedBy: jokketan at hotmail.com
iptables v1.4.2
from the man page:
 --ports port[,port|,port:port]...
              Match if either the source or destination ports are equal to one
of the given ports.
when trying:
iptables -A INPUT --proto tcp --ports 443 -j ACCEPT
iptables v1.4.2: Unknown arg `(null)'
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
i've seen the same thing in v1.2.9 under mandrake. Is the --ports argument
depcricated or something? Either there is something wrong with iptables or the
man pages are incorrect.
Best regards,
Jonathan.
-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.netfilter.org
2009-Feb-25  18:35 UTC
[Bug 579] iptables --ports argument unknown
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579
christoph.paasch at gmail.com changed:
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID
------- Comment #1 from christoph.paasch at gmail.com  2009-02-25 19:35 -------
You must add -m multiport, to load this module:
iptables -A INPUT --proto tcp -m multiport --ports 443 -j ACCEPT
The manpage is correct, as it says you must use -m.
-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables-1.2.9
- Kmemleak: false-positive in vring_add_indirect ?
- Kmemleak: false-positive in vring_add_indirect ?
- [Bug 447] New: iptables doesn't support multiple times the same match in one rule
- [Bug 451] New: ip6tables port range support in multiport modules is broken