Rowland Penny
2025-Mar-16 14:05 UTC
[Samba] Will there be samba updates to Bookworm backports, while Debian is in pre release freeze?
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 13:53:26 +0100 Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> Hi folks, > > As Debian is preparing for a new major upgrade from Bookworm to > Trixie, changes are frozen in different steps. From yesterday (March > 15), there is a transition and toolchain freeze. From April 15 and on > there are further, more strict freezes. > > Does that imply that Samba updates to Bookworm backports will be > halted during the freeze period? > > Best regards, > > Peter > >These are just my thoughts on the subject. It is my understanding that 'backported' packages are taken from 'testing' and backported to 'stable'. At the moment, 'stable' is Bookworm and 'testing' is Trixie, so from my understanding, Bookworm backports should contain Samba from Trixie, the only problem is, it apparently doesn't. The Samba package in Trixie at present is 4.22.0, so there may be an update to come, only Michael can tell us this. Once Trixie is released, I wouldn't expect there to be any further updates to Bookworm backports, at that point, Trixie would then be 'stable' and Bookworm would be 'oldstable'. Rowland
Peter Milesson
2025-Mar-16 14:54 UTC
[Samba] Will there be samba updates to Bookworm backports, while Debian is in pre release freeze?
On 16.03.2025 15:05, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 13:53:26 +0100 > Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> As Debian is preparing for a new major upgrade from Bookworm to >> Trixie, changes are frozen in different steps. From yesterday (March >> 15), there is a transition and toolchain freeze. From April 15 and on >> there are further, more strict freezes. >> >> Does that imply that Samba updates to Bookworm backports will be >> halted during the freeze period? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Peter >> >> > These are just my thoughts on the subject. > > It is my understanding that 'backported' packages are taken from > 'testing' and backported to 'stable'. At the moment, 'stable' is > Bookworm and 'testing' is Trixie, so from my understanding, Bookworm > backports should contain Samba from Trixie, the only problem is, it > apparently doesn't. The Samba package in Trixie at present is 4.22.0, > so there may be an update to come, only Michael can tell us this. > > Once Trixie is released, I wouldn't expect there to be any further > updates to Bookworm backports, at that point, Trixie would then be > 'stable' and Bookworm would be 'oldstable'. > > Rowland > >Hi Rowland, Thanks for the explanation. Maybe I did not formulate my question properly. As the freeze period starts for testing (Trixie), there will be a point where no updates to testing will be allowed, which implies that neither Bookworm backports will get any updates. If I understand the Debian documentation correctly, only packages with limited impact on other packages will be allowed in the current phase (transition and toolchain freeze). Is Samba considered to have a high impact on other packages, or is it possible to assume that there still will be some updates to Samba in Bookworm backports? The reason I ask is, that otherwise, there will be quite a hiatus with Samba updates, until Trixie is released (probably July-August), and Samba 4.23 almost knocking on the door. Best regards, Peter