I?ve been guilty of this myself. I think a check would be good.
In my case I was using the new sort_by() function (I think also 4.1) and a
user was failing to install on R 4.0.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:30 Jan Net?k <netikja at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a server with R 3.6.3 installed and I struggled a bit with
> updating several R packages that utilizes some new syntax introduced in R
> 4.1.0, such as the native pipe |> or function definition shorthand \(x)
...
>
> The thing is that these packages states "Depends: R (>=
3.6.0)" and pass R
> CMD Check without any issues. My problem occurred at the installation time.
> I can see that developers naturally include the new handy syntax but
> oftentimes forget to raise R version dependency in their DESCRIPTIONs.
> Should we employ some new checks?
>
> Best,
> Jan
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]