http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz.sig - deliver: v1.0.2's bounce fix caused message to be always saved to INBOX even if Sieve script had discard, reject or redirect commands. - LDAP: auth_bind=yes and empty auth_bind_userdn leaked memory - ACL plugin: If user was given i (insert) right for a mailbox, but not all s/t/w (seen, deleted, other flags) rights, COPY and APPEND commands weren't supposed to allow saving those flags. This is technically a security fix, but it's unlikely this caused problems for anyone. - ACL plugin: i (insert) right didn't work unless user was also given l (lookup) right. - Solaris: Fixed filesystem quota for autofs mounts. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070801/22e27183/attachment-0002.bin>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:22:59PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz.sigNo dovecot-sieve-1.0.3 tarball (yet)? Geert
Timo Sirainen wrote:> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz.sig > >Thank you! -- Leroy
any one have debian etch package for this ? :) On 8/1/2007, "Timo Sirainen" <tss at iki.fi> wrote:>http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz >http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz.sig > > - deliver: v1.0.2's bounce fix caused message to be always saved to > INBOX even if Sieve script had discard, reject or redirect commands. > - LDAP: auth_bind=yes and empty auth_bind_userdn leaked memory > - ACL plugin: If user was given i (insert) right for a mailbox, but > not all s/t/w (seen, deleted, other flags) rights, COPY and APPEND > commands weren't supposed to allow saving those flags. This is > technically a security fix, but it's unlikely this caused problems > for anyone. > - ACL plugin: i (insert) right didn't work unless user was also given > l (lookup) right. > - Solaris: Fixed filesystem quota for autofs mounts. >
Frank Behrens
2007-Aug-02 13:09 UTC
[Dovecot] Faked address on list (was Re: v1.0.3 released)
<kakuz2 at pinky.frank-behrens.de> wrote on 2 Aug 2007 11:40:> > any one have debian etch package for this ? :)Who are you? You are not somebody @pinky.frank-behrens.de, because that's me. Your email shows:> Received: from sagat.suryasoft.net (unknown [202.148.14.20]) > by dovecot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDF5FA8980 > for <dovecot at dovecot.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 04:41:08 +0000 (UTC) > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by sagat.suryasoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874B6C077D > for <dovecot at dovecot.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:41:02 +0700 (WIT) > X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at sagat.suryasoft.net Received: > from sagat.suryasoft.net ([127.0.0.1]) > by localhost (sagat.suryaoffice.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, > port 10024) with ESMTP id hG6dfTyx9sNf for <dovecot at dovecot.org>; > Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:40:50 +0700 (WIT) > Received: by sagat.suryasoft.net (Postfix, from userid 33) > id 7980EC0B11; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:40:50 +0700 (WIT) > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Received: from 10.26.5.250 (auth. user kakuz2 at localhost) > by 10.26.5.112 with HTTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:40:50 +0000 > X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.14 (On: 10.26.5.112) > Message-ID: <Azpf7uEV.1186029650.4022870.kakuz2 at localhost> > In-Reply-To: <1185963779.29782.57.camel at hurina> > From: <kakuz2 at pinky.frank-behrens.de>Regards, Frank -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.
Frank Behrens
2007-Aug-02 13:25 UTC
[Dovecot] Faked address on list (was Re: v1.0.3 released)
Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.net> wrote on 2 Aug 2007 15:18:> something saner, and yours is misconfigured to qualify localhost to your > pinky hostname even on incoming mail. He shows up as kakuz2 at localhost > for me.Thanks for this explanation. So I believe I should check my mailserver. Regards, Frank -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.