Hi. Since this revision (appeared in 6.3) I think ipfw violates POLA. I mean "ipfw table N list" shows values of table in Internet '.' notation. A friend of mine was surprised to found Internet representation of this "optional 32-bit unsigned value". For example security/bruteblock stores unix timestamps here and AFAICS there is no possibility to come back to the previous output format (other than reverting this revision). -- wbr, pluknet
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 06:02:16PM +0300, pluknet wrote:> Since this revision (appeared in 6.3) I think ipfw violates POLA. > I mean "ipfw table N list" shows values of table in Internet '.' notation. > > A friend of mine was surprised to found Internet representation > of this "optional 32-bit unsigned value". > > For example security/bruteblock stores unix timestamps here > and AFAICS there is no possibility to come back to the previous > output format (other than reverting this revision).That was fixed 8 months ago. Just upgrade to 6.4. Eugene Grosbein
2008/12/2 Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher@yandex.ru>:> 02.12.08, 18:02, "pluknet" <pluknet@gmail.com>: >> Since this revision (appeared in 6.3) I think ipfw violates POLA. >> I mean "ipfw table N list" shows values of table in Internet '.' notation. >> A friend of mine was surprised to found Internet representation >> of this "optional 32-bit unsigned value". >> For example security/bruteblock stores unix timestamps here >> and AFAICS there is no possibility to come back to the previous >> output format (other than reverting this revision). > > It fixed in 1.76.2.21. > > -- > WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov >Andrey, Eugene. Thank you all! And please forgive me my laziness, not allowed to check up last revisions of ipfw2.c. -- wbr, pluknet
02.12.08, 18:02, "pluknet" <pluknet@gmail.com>:> Since this revision (appeared in 6.3) I think ipfw violates POLA. > I mean "ipfw table N list" shows values of table in Internet '.' notation. > A friend of mine was surprised to found Internet representation > of this "optional 32-bit unsigned value". > For example security/bruteblock stores unix timestamps here > and AFAICS there is no possibility to come back to the previous > output format (other than reverting this revision).It fixed in 1.76.2.21. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Apparently Analagous Threads
- FreeBSD 8.1 out, has zfs vserion 14 and can boot from zfs
- Promise SX4060 on 7.1-BETA2
- SATA devices not added/probed from ICH7 sata300 controller, FreeBSD7.0, 7.1beta, 8.0 Daily
- bge0: EEPROM read timed
- Missing SSHFP RRs / VerifyHostKeyDNS & StrictHostKeyChecking