Hi all, We''ve moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet to respond to my email :( The 1.1.0 docs are there. The 1.0.8 docs are still at http://rspec.rubyforge.org for the time being. We''ll be archiving them at the new site soon. This new site is hosted on our shiny new sponsored slice at Engine Yard, which will soon be the host for our source repository as well. Speaking of the new source repo, we got a lot of feedback pushing towards using git over hg, but we have some reasons that we might prefer hg. So here''s what we''re going to do. We''re going to work in one for a month, and then the other, and then make a decision. I''ll follow up as to which we''re using first and how to access the repo. Either way, we''ll continue to push changes over to the svn repo at rubyforge, so if you don''t want to participate in our experiment you don''t have to - though we will be asking patch contributors to so that we can really get a feel for what it''s like to deal with patches, updates, etc with both tools. Cheers, David
On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > We''ve moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > to respond to my email :( > > The 1.1.0 docs are there.Cool. You might want to change the upgrade instructions page to use the http instead of svn urls. -- Rick DeNatale My blog on Ruby http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
David Chelimsky wrote:> We''ve moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > to respond to my email :(Squatters make getting a decent domain name nearly impossible these days. When searching for a .com, I''m almost excited to violence. Sorry for the digression. With Regards, // Signed // Cody P. Skidmore
On Dec 14, 2007 9:12 AM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale at gmail.com> wrote:> On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We''ve moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > > to respond to my email :( > > > > The 1.1.0 docs are there. > > Cool. > > You might want to change the upgrade instructions page to use the http > instead of svn urls.Done. Thanks.> > -- > Rick DeNatale > > My blog on Ruby > http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
On 14 dec 2007, at 16:05, David Chelimsky wrote:> Hi all, > > The 1.1.0 docs are there. The 1.0.8 docs are still at > http://rspec.rubyforge.org for the time being. We''ll be archiving them > at the new site soon.Sweet! Any idea when the docs for the plain text Stories are online? I''m struggling with something like When I POST to /posts with :name => "Post Title", :body => "Body" at the moment. cheers, bartz
On Dec 14, 2007, at 10:05 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:> Hi all, > > We''ve moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > to respond to my email :( >So now will you update the site more frequently than before? I remember you had some problems with rubyforge, and would only update the site after every release. Scott
On Dec 14, 2007 9:55 AM, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote:> > On Dec 14, 2007, at 10:05 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We''ve moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > > to respond to my email :( > > > > So now will you update the site more frequently than before? I > remember you had some problems with rubyforge, and would only update > the site after every release.We''ll update clarifications and bug fixes, yes. We''re also going to be setting up CI, and once we do we''ll include a build of the docs so there will be a place where you can see the docs updated trunk too. But all this in time :)> > Scott > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
On Dec 14, 2007 9:28 AM, Bart Zonneveld <loop at superinfinite.com> wrote:> > On 14 dec 2007, at 16:05, David Chelimsky wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The 1.1.0 docs are there. The 1.0.8 docs are still at > > http://rspec.rubyforge.org for the time being. We''ll be archiving them > > at the new site soon. > > Sweet! > Any idea when the docs for the plain text Stories are online? > I''m struggling with something like When I POST to /posts with :name => > "Post Title", :body => "Body" at the moment.No idea right now. Priorities :) If anyone wants to start contributing them, however, I''ll push ''em to the site.> > cheers, > bartz > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:> On Dec 14, 2007 9:12 AM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/14/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We''ve moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want > > > http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet > > > to respond to my email :( > > > > > > The 1.1.0 docs are there. > > > > Cool. > > > > You might want to change the upgrade instructions page to use the http > > instead of svn urls. > > Done. Thanks. >I''m having trouble finding any documentation on nested from the description on your blog they look like an alternate/hierarchical way to do what shared groups did before. Am I thinking about them the right way? Also, I know that it might be competition for your upcoming book, but the doc wouldn''t be available in a form which was more amenable to producing nice hardcopy, would it? I''d manually massaged the old 1.0.8 version on rubyforge into a pages document, but that was a pain. If not, I''d volunteer to help, if I can scrape up the bandwidth. -- Rick DeNatale My blog on Ruby http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
On Dec 14, 2007 9:59 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:> On Dec 14, 2007 9:28 AM, Bart Zonneveld <loop at superinfinite.com> wrote: > > > > On 14 dec 2007, at 16:05, David Chelimsky wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > The 1.1.0 docs are there. The 1.0.8 docs are still at > > > http://rspec.rubyforge.org for the time being. We''ll be archiving them > > > at the new site soon. > > > > Sweet! > > Any idea when the docs for the plain text Stories are online? > > I''m struggling with something like When I POST to /posts with :name => > > "Post Title", :body => "Body" at the moment. >+1 If I might suggest a simple addition to the site. Just fill out the part "(detail left out for brevity)" on the story on the front page. IOW, put the detail back in somewhere for clarity. That would get a a lot of folks jump-started on Stories. At least have the require statements and list the needed helpers. Thanks Ed