Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-Aug-06 15:10 UTC
[PATCH v4] virtio_pmem: add the missing REQ_OP_WRITE for flush bio
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 09:03:20PM +0000, Verma, Vishal L wrote:> On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 20:39 +0200, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > > Gentle ping! > > > > Dan, Vishal for suggestion/review on this patch and request for merging. > > +Cc Michael for awareness, as virtio-pmem device is currently broken. > > Looks good to me, > > Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma at intel.com> > > Dave, will you queue this for 6.6.Generally if you expect me to merge a patch I should be CC'd.> > > > Thanks, > > Pankaj > > > > > From: Hou Tao <houtao1 at huawei.com> > > > > > > When doing mkfs.xfs on a pmem device, the following warning was > > > reported: > > > > > > ?------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > ?WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 384 at block/blk-core.c:751 submit_bio_noacct > > > ?Modules linked in: > > > ?CPU: 2 PID: 384 Comm: mkfs.xfs Not tainted 6.4.0-rc7+ #154 > > > ?Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) > > > ?RIP: 0010:submit_bio_noacct+0x340/0x520 > > > ?...... > > > ?Call Trace: > > > ? <TASK> > > > ? ? submit_bio_noacct+0xd5/0x520 > > > ? submit_bio+0x37/0x60 > > > ? async_pmem_flush+0x79/0xa0 > > > ? nvdimm_flush+0x17/0x40 > > > ? pmem_submit_bio+0x370/0x390 > > > ? __submit_bio+0xbc/0x190 > > > ? submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x14d/0x370 > > > ? submit_bio_noacct+0x1ef/0x520 > > > ? submit_bio+0x55/0x60 > > > ? submit_bio_wait+0x5a/0xc0 > > > ? blkdev_issue_flush+0x44/0x60 > > > > > > The root cause is that submit_bio_noacct() needs bio_op() is either > > > WRITE or ZONE_APPEND for flush bio and async_pmem_flush() doesn't assign > > > REQ_OP_WRITE when allocating flush bio, so submit_bio_noacct just fail > > > the flush bio. > > > > > > Simply fix it by adding the missing REQ_OP_WRITE for flush bio. And we > > > could fix the flush order issue and do flush optimization later. > > > > > > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org?# 6.3+ > > > Fixes: b4a6bb3a67aa ("block: add a sanity check for non-write flush/fua bios") > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> > > > Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch at nvidia.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at amd.com> > > > Tested-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at amd.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1 at huawei.com> > > > --- > > > v4: > > > ?* add stable Cc > > > ?* collect Rvb and Tested-by tags > > > > > > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20230625022633.2753877-1-houtao at huaweicloud.com > > > ?* adjust the overly long lines in both commit message and code > > > > > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20230621134340.878461-1-houtao at huaweicloud.com > > > ?* do a minimal fix first (Suggested by Christoph) > > > > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ZJLpYMC8FgtZ0k2k at infradead.org/T/#t > > > > > > ?drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c | 3 ++- > > > ?1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c b/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c > > > index c6a648fd8744..1f8c667c6f1e 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c > > > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c > > > @@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ int async_pmem_flush(struct nd_region *nd_region, struct bio *bio) > > > ???????? * parent bio. Otherwise directly call nd_region flush. > > > ???????? */ > > > ??????? if (bio && bio->bi_iter.bi_sector != -1) { > > > -?????????????? struct bio *child = bio_alloc(bio->bi_bdev, 0, REQ_PREFLUSH, > > > +?????????????? struct bio *child = bio_alloc(bio->bi_bdev, 0, > > > +???????????????????????????????????????????? REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_PREFLUSH, > > > ????????????????????????????????????????????? GFP_ATOMIC); > > > > > > ??????????????? if (!child) > > > -- > > > 2.29.2 > > > >
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [PATCH v4] virtio_pmem: add the missing REQ_OP_WRITE for flush bio
- [PATCH v12 2/7] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver
- [PATCH v8 2/6] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver
- [PATCH v9 2/7] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver
- [PATCH v10 2/7] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver