Hi Folks, I''ve recently moved from a .NET to a rails shop and am helping them set up CI for their tests. CruiseControl.rb looks like exactly what we need, and as a bonus it''s a great little app for me to root around in to see how grown-up rails apps should be written (I hope!) One major thing that drew us to ccrb is git support. I asked on the git IRC channel and most people seemed to be using ccrb. I''m a little confused about which version to use though! * The ''official'' thoughtworks website http:// cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com/ points to rubyforge, and claims only SVN support. I guess that''s because the versions that support git are only experimental at the moment? * There''s a branch on github here: http://github.com/benburkert/ cruisecontrolrb/tree/master which I''ve got working with our git repo. yay! * But then I saw a post from Jeremy Lightsmith very recently on this list (http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/2008- August/000560.html) pointing to the new github branch: http:// github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rb So what''s the git support like in the new thoughtworks github repo? Should I move over to that? Also, I spotted an issues list on lighthouse (http:// cruisecontrolrb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/9150-cruise-control-rb/ overview), but the official page points to jira for issues. I just found this blog post (http://work.onemanswalk.com/2008/4/23/cruise- control-rb-is-moving-to-lighthouse) so I''m guessing lighthouse is now the one. Might be worth updating the website a little. Great work so far, I look forward to contributing some additions when I get the hang of this ruby lark! cheers, Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/attachments/20080808/ef99a9a6/attachment.html>
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Matt Wynne <matt at mattwynne.net> wrote:> * There''s a branch on github > here: http://github.com/benburkert/cruisecontrolrb/tree/master which I''ve > got working with our git repo. yay! > * But then I saw a post from Jeremy Lightsmith very recently on this list > (http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/2008-August/000560.html) > pointing to the new github > branch: http://github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rbI''ll tell you what I can. I think that benburkert''s should be changed to a branch off the new "official" one, but not sure if that is possible/hard on GitHub. From what I''ve heard, should be possible if all the branches are deleted?> So what''s the git support like in the new thoughtworks github repo? Should I > move over to that?I''ve found some bugs which I reported on Lighthouse (and tagged with git), and referenced in a recent thread on this list. I think benburkert''s may be more stable, but it uses Grit, which has native dependencies. This has been discussed on a separate thread as well. Not sure of the latest status on everything, no updates on those threads... -- Chad
Thanks Chad. I guess I''ll stick with benburkert''s version for the time being then, and watch here for updates. cheers, Matt On 8 Aug 2008, at 12:55, Chad Woolley wrote:> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Matt Wynne <matt at mattwynne.net> wrote: >> * There''s a branch on github >> here: http://github.com/benburkert/cruisecontrolrb/tree/master >> which I''ve >> got working with our git repo. yay! >> * But then I saw a post from Jeremy Lightsmith very recently on >> this list >> (http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/2008-August/ >> 000560.html) >> pointing to the new github >> branch: http://github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rb > > I''ll tell you what I can. > > I think that benburkert''s should be changed to a branch off the new > "official" one, but not sure if that is possible/hard on GitHub. From > what I''ve heard, should be possible if all the branches are deleted? > >> So what''s the git support like in the new thoughtworks github >> repo? Should I >> move over to that? > > I''ve found some bugs which I reported on Lighthouse (and tagged with > git), and referenced in a recent thread on this list. I think > benburkert''s may be more stable, but it uses Grit, which has native > dependencies. This has been discussed on a separate thread as well. > Not sure of the latest status on everything, no updates on those > threads... > > -- Chad > _______________________________________________ > Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list > Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users