Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-Sep-23 05:25 UTC
答复: [PATCH] vDPA/ifcvf: fix the Calculation of queuepair
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:52:05AM +0000, Angus Chen wrote:> > > > On 9/22/2022 6:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 06:07:58PM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote: > >> > >> On 9/22/2022 5:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 08:55:26AM +0000, Angus Chen wrote: > >>>> >From 4f65eae86ab15d7abb8bd30401187cb195dfd27b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > >>>> >2001 > >>>> From: "angus.chen" <angus.chen at jaguarmicro.com> > >>>> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:47:28 +0800 > >>>> Subject: [PATCH] vDPA/ifcvf: fix the Calculation of queuepair > >>>> > >>>> The queuepair should be divided by 2 > >>> this is just repeating what the patch does. > >>> can you include more info pls? > >>> > >>> Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst says among other things: > >>> > >>> To that end, the summary line should describe the effects of and > >>> motivation for the change as well as possible given the one-line > >>> constraint. The detailed description can then amplify on those > >>> topics and provide any needed additional information. If the patch > >>> fixes a bug, cite the commit which introduced the bug if possible > >>> (and please provide both the commit ID and the title when citing > >>> commits). If a problem is associated with specific log or compiler > >>> output, include that output to help others searching for a solution > >>> to the same problem. If the change is meant to support other > >>> changes coming in later patch, say so. If internal APIs are > >>> changed, detail those changes and how other developers should > >>> respond. In general, the more you can put yourself into the shoes > >>> of everybody who will be reading your changelog, the better that > >>> changelog (and the kernel as a > >>> whole) will be. > >>> > >>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: angus.chen <angus.chen at jaguarmicro.com> > >>> Format should be > >>> > >>> Angus Chen <angus.chen at jaguarmicro.com> > >>> > >>> Also pls drop leading space. > >>> > >>> > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 4 ++-- > >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c > >>>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c index 75a703b803a2..3e4486bfa0b7 > >>>> 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c > >>>> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ u16 ifcvf_get_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid) > >>>> u32 q_pair_id; > >>>> > >>>> ifcvf_lm = (struct ifcvf_lm_cfg __iomem *)hw->lm_cfg; > >>>> - q_pair_id = qid / hw->nr_vring; > >>>> + q_pair_id = qid / 2; > >> Yes, this should be 2 and actually this cap never work as expected, > >> we are re-designing this. > > Do you ack this patch then? > Yes, > > Thank you ,should I resend a patch again without style problem?If you have the time - it's easier for me if you do, yes. -- MST