Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-Nov-25 07:02 UTC
[PATCH 1/2] eni_vdpa: Fix an error handling path in 'eni_vdpa_probe()'
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:34:02AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:> Le 25/11/2021 ? 00:58, Michael S. Tsirkin a ?crit?: > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:21:44PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > > Le 09/11/2021 ? 03:54, Jason Wang a ?crit?: > > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 3:32 AM Christophe JAILLET > > > > <christophe.jaillet at wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Le 08/11/2021 ? 06:55, Jason Wang a ?crit : > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 12:15 AM Christophe JAILLET > > > > > > <christophe.jaillet at wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the error handling path, a successful 'vp_legacy_probe()' should be > > > > > > > balanced by a corresponding 'vp_legacy_remove()' call, as already done in > > > > > > > the remove function. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add the missing call and update gotos accordingly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: e85087beedca ("eni_vdpa: add vDPA driver for Alibaba ENI") > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet at wanadoo.fr> > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > drivers/vdpa/alibaba/eni_vdpa.c | 6 ++++-- > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/alibaba/eni_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/alibaba/eni_vdpa.c > > > > > > > index 3f788794571a..12b3db6b4517 100644 > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/alibaba/eni_vdpa.c > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/alibaba/eni_vdpa.c > > > > > > > @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static int eni_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id) > > > > > > > if (!eni_vdpa->vring) { > > > > > > > ret = -ENOMEM; > > > > > > > ENI_ERR(pdev, "failed to allocate virtqueues\n"); > > > > > > > - goto err; > > > > > > > + goto err_remove_vp_legacy; > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < eni_vdpa->queues; i++) { > > > > > > > @@ -513,11 +513,13 @@ static int eni_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id) > > > > > > > ret = vdpa_register_device(&eni_vdpa->vdpa, eni_vdpa->queues); > > > > > > > if (ret) { > > > > > > > ENI_ERR(pdev, "failed to register to vdpa bus\n"); > > > > > > > - goto err; > > > > > > > + goto err_remove_vp_legacy; > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +err_remove_vp_legacy: > > > > > > > + vp_legacy_remove(&eni_vdpa->ldev); > > > > > > > > > > > > Won't vp_legacy_remove() be triggered by the put_devic() below? > > > > > > > > > > Hi, I'm sorry but i don't see how. > > > > > > > > > > My understanding is that: > > > > > - on "put_device(&eni_vdpa->vdpa.dev);", the corresponding release > > > > > function will be called. > > > > > > > > > > - This release function is the one recorded in the > > > > > '__vdpa_alloc_device()' function. > > > > > > > > > > - So it should be 'vdpa_release_dev()'. > > > > > > > > > > - This function, AFAIU, has no knowledge of 'vp_legacy_remove()' or > > > > > anything that could call it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unless I misread something or miss something obvious, I don't see how > > > > > 'vp_legacy_remove() would be called. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you elaborate? > > > > > > > > I think the device should release the driver (see > > > > device_release_driver()) during during its deleting. > > > > > > Hi, I still don't follow the logic and I don't understand how > > > 'vp_legacy_remove()' will finely be called, but it is not that important. > > > > > > If it's fine for you, it's fine for me :) > > > > > > CJ > > > > So pls post just patch 2? > > Patch 2/2 should apply cleanly with or without patch 1/2. > Do I really need to send a v2 just for dropping the first patch? :/ > > CJIt is preferable, yes. A patch in isolation is not the same as a patch in the series.> > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > err: > > > > > > > put_device(&eni_vdpa->vdpa.dev); > > > > > > > return ret; > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > 2.30.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Virtualization mailing list > > > > Virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization > > > > > > > >