On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:53:08AM +0800, Jason Wang
wrote:>
> ? 2021/5/18 ??5:48, Dave Taht ??:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 1:23 PM Willem de Bruijn
> > <willemdebruijn.kernel at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:44 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht at
gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Not really related to this patch, but is there some reason
why virtio
> > > > has no support for BQL?
> > > There have been a few attempts to add it over the years.
> > >
> > > Most recently,
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181205225323.12555-2-mst at redhat.com/
> > >
> > > That thread has a long discussion. I think the key open issue
remains
> > >
> > > "The tricky part is the mode switching between napi and no
napi."
> > Oy, vey.
> >
> > I didn't pay any attention to that discussion, sadly enough.
> >
> > It's been about that long (2018) since I paid any attention to
> > bufferbloat in the cloud and my cloudy provider (linode) switched to
> > using virtio when I wasn't looking. For over a year now, I'd
been
> > getting reports saying that comcast's pie rollout wasn't
working as
> > well as expected, that evenroute's implementation of sch_cake and
sqm
> > on inbound wasn't working right, nor pf_sense's and numerous
other
> > issues at Internet scale.
> >
> > Last week I ran a string of benchmarks against starlink's new
services
> > and was really aghast at what I found there, too. but the problem
> > seemed deeper than in just the dishy...
> >
> > Without BQL, there's no backpressure for fq_codel to do its thing.
> > None. My measurement servers aren't FQ-codeling
> > no matter how much load I put on them. Since that qdisc is the default
> > now in most linux distributions, I imagine that the bulk of the cloud
> > is now behaving as erratically as linux was in 2011 with enormous
> > swings in throughput and latency from GSO/TSO hitting overlarge rx/tx
> > rings, [1], breaking various rate estimators in codel, pie and the tcp
> > stack itself.
> >
> > See:
> >
> >
http://fremont.starlink.taht.net/~d/virtio_nobql/rrul_-_evenroute_v3_server_fq_codel.png
> >
> > See the swings in latency there? that's symptomatic of tx/rx rings
> > filling and emptying.
> >
> > it wasn't until I switched my measurement server temporarily over
to
> > sch_fq that I got a rrul result that was close to the results we used
> > to get from the virtualized e1000e drivers we were using in 2014.
> >
> >
http://fremont.starlink.taht.net/~d/virtio_nobql/rrul_-_evenroute_v3_server_fq.png
> >
> > While I have long supported the use of sch_fq for tcp-heavy workloads,
> > it still behaves better with bql in place, and fq_codel is better for
> > generic workloads... but needs bql based backpressure to kick in.
> >
> > [1] I really hope I'm overreacting but, um, er, could someone(s)
spin
> > up a new patch that does bql in some way even half right for this
> > driver and help test it? I haven't built a kernel in a while.
>
>
> I think it's time to obsolete skb_orphan() for virtio-net to get rid of
a
> brunch of tricky codes in the current virtio-net driver.
>
> Then we can do BQL on top.
>
> I will prepare some patches to do this (probably with Michael's BQL
patch).
>
> Thanks
First step would be to fix up and test the BQL part.
IIRC it didn't seem to help performance in our benchmarking,
and Eric seems to say that's expected ...
>
> >
> >
> > > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:41 AM Xianting Tian
> > > > <xianting.tian at linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > > > > BUG_ON() uses unlikely in if(), which can be optimized
at compile time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian at
linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 5 ++---
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > index c921ebf3ae82..212d52204884 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > @@ -1646,10 +1646,9 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct
send_queue *sq, struct
> > > > > sk_buff *skb)
> > > > > else
> > > > > hdr = skb_vnet_hdr(skb);
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (virtio_net_hdr_from_skb(skb,
&hdr->hdr,
> > > > > + BUG_ON(virtio_net_hdr_from_skb(skb,
&hdr->hdr,
> > > > >
virtio_is_little_endian(vi->vdev), false,
> > > > > - 0))
> > > > > - BUG();
> > > > > + 0));
> > > > >
> > > > > if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> > > > > hdr->num_buffers = 0;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.17.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Latest Podcast:
> > > >
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/
> > > >
> > > > Dave T?ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> >
> >
> > --
> > Latest Podcast:
> >
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/
> >
> > Dave T?ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> >