On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 07:25:04AM -0500, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote:> I wonder whether RH plan to fight back FUD they've brought upon by their > December announcement.I mean.... really the only thing we can do is live up to the given plan with Stream and RHEL options, which as far as I can see is exactly what's happening.> Personally, I found this "no-cost" promise lacking substantial details.This is just the announcement of it, of course. The full details will be there when the whole thing is launched, which the announcement says will be very soon.> If RH doesn't verify everyone requesting developer subscription (forcing > to prove identity), the 16 installations limit is easily circumvented by > multiple registrations.There are always going to be cheaters. Don't be one of them. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader
Can RH put a stop to projects like Rocky Linux?> On 22 Jan 2021, at 18:04, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > > ?On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 07:25:04AM -0500, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote: >> I wonder whether RH plan to fight back FUD they've brought upon by their >> December announcement. > > I mean.... really the only thing we can do is live up to the given plan with > Stream and RHEL options, which as far as I can see is exactly what's > happening. > >> Personally, I found this "no-cost" promise lacking substantial details. > > This is just the announcement of it, of course. The full details will be > there when the whole thing is launched, which the announcement says will be > very soon. > > >> If RH doesn't verify everyone requesting developer subscription (forcing >> to prove identity), the 16 installations limit is easily circumvented by >> multiple registrations. > > There are always going to be cheaters. Don't be one of them. > > > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 23.01.2021 01:04, Matthew Miller wrote:> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 07:25:04AM -0500, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOSwrote:>> I wonder whether RH plan to fight back FUD they've brought upon by their >> December announcement. > > I mean.... really the only thing we can do is live up to the given planwith> Stream and RHEL options, which as far as I can see is exactly what's > happening.Well, I did whatever look best to move on, for the assets I am responsible for.>> Personally, I found this "no-cost" promise lacking substantial details. > > This is just the announcement of it, of course. The full details will be > there when the whole thing is launched, which the announcement says willbe> very soon.I will subscribe to it, to keep being updated. After all, I am curious about the consequences.>> If RH doesn't verify everyone requesting developer subscription (forcing >> to prove identity), the 16 installations limit is easily circumvented by >> multiple registrations. > > There are always going to be cheaters. Don't be one of them.Sure thing. I also do solemnly swear that I will faithfully abide by corresponding licenses, copyright laws and other related legal words of power. -- Sincerely, Konstantin Boyandin system administrator (ProWide Labs Ltd. - IPHost Network Monitor)