On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 16:08, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org>
wrote:>
> This seems like a good opportunity to give this a go:
https://github.com/juhp/fbrnch#parallel-building
>
I did ask for some enhancements for bootstrap builds there, but I
don't know how well it works yet. Also, I'm not too sure it
understands our virtual Provides/BuildRequires, but if that is added,
then it's a good choice for determining build order.
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 21:59, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> That is a very good point. Oh well. Anyone want to help generate the
build order? :)
>>
>> ~spot
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade
<quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, <spotrh at
gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics
drivers? I would
>>>> really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Unless you mean rebuild for testing purposes, because you added the
R(ABI) = major.minor Provides/Requires, you need to rebuild the world anyway.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~spot
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at
fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, Jos? Ab?lio Matos
<jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Hi all,
>>>> > > what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora?
>>>> >
>>>> > See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release
and
>>>> > coordinate updates.
>>>> >
>>>> > [1]
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html
>>>> >
>>>> > > What are the pitfalls and the changes that we
should be aware?
>>>> >
>>>> > The NEWS says: "The graphics engine version,
R_GE_version, has been
>>>> > bumped to 14 and so packages that provide graphics devices
should be
>>>> > reinstalled." But anyway, we should do the customary
mass rebuild of
>>>> > packages to avoid other possible incompatibilities and
"Package was
>>>> > built under version 4.0" messages.
>>>> >
>>>> > I?aki
>>>> >
>>>> > > The second semester (with the corresponding induced
pandemic chaos) is
>>>> > > dimming down around here so I have at least time to
breath again. :-)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > FWIW I am in no hurry to have 4.1 in Fedora 34, my
main interest is to
>>>> > have
>>>> > > it in rawhide and later if we find it suitable to
backport it to F34.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > FWIW since our last talk Octave (for version 7 at
least) is starting by
>>>> > > default to have the major version in the path for
packages. :-)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Best regards,
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > Jos? Ab?lio
>>>> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>> > >
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
>>>> > > R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
>>>> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > I?aki ?car
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
>>>> > R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
>>>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
>>>> R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
>
>
>
> --
> I?aki ?car
--
Elliott