Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-Oct-11 10:49 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: vlan: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> Currently it's possible for someone to send a vlan range to the kernel with the pvid flag set which will result in the pvid bouncing from a vlan to vlan and isn't correct, it also introduces problems for hardware where it doesn't make sense having more than 1 pvid. iproute2 already enforces this, so let's enforce it on kernel-side as well. Reported-by: Elad Raz <eladr at mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> --- net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c index d78b4429505a..02b17b53e9a6 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c @@ -524,6 +524,9 @@ static int br_afspec(struct net_bridge *br, if (vinfo_start) return -EINVAL; vinfo_start = vinfo; + /* don't allow range of pvids */ + if (vinfo_start->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID) + return -EINVAL; continue; } -- 2.4.3
David Miller
2015-Oct-13 02:59 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: vlan: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor at blackwall.org> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:49:56 +0200> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> > > Currently it's possible for someone to send a vlan range to the kernel > with the pvid flag set which will result in the pvid bouncing from a > vlan to vlan and isn't correct, it also introduces problems for hardware > where it doesn't make sense having more than 1 pvid. iproute2 already > enforces this, so let's enforce it on kernel-side as well. > > Reported-by: Elad Raz <eladr at mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com>Applied, thanks.