Xin Long
2016-Apr-05 03:32 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCHv2 net-next 2/6] bridge: simplify the forward_delay_store by calling store_bridge_parm
There are some repetitive codes in forward_delay_store, we can remove
them by calling store_bridge_parm.
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin at gmail.com>
---
net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
index c48f6b0..137cd3b 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
@@ -160,29 +160,22 @@ static ssize_t group_fwd_mask_show(struct device *d,
return sprintf(buf, "%#x\n", br->group_fwd_mask);
}
-
-static ssize_t group_fwd_mask_store(struct device *d,
- struct device_attribute *attr,
- const char *buf,
- size_t len)
+static int set_group_fwd_mask(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
{
- struct net_bridge *br = to_bridge(d);
- char *endp;
- unsigned long val;
-
- if (!ns_capable(dev_net(br->dev)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
- return -EPERM;
-
- val = simple_strtoul(buf, &endp, 0);
- if (endp == buf)
- return -EINVAL;
-
if (val & BR_GROUPFWD_RESTRICTED)
return -EINVAL;
br->group_fwd_mask = val;
- return len;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static ssize_t group_fwd_mask_store(struct device *d,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf,
+ size_t len)
+{
+ return store_bridge_parm(d, buf, len, set_group_fwd_mask);
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(group_fwd_mask);
--
2.1.0
Xin Long
2016-Apr-05 03:32 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCHv2 net-next 3/6] bridge: simplify the stp_state_store by calling store_bridge_parm
There are some repetitive codes in stp_state_store, we can remove
them by calling store_bridge_parm.
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin at gmail.com>
---
net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
index 137cd3b..9918763 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
@@ -128,27 +128,17 @@ static ssize_t stp_state_show(struct device *d,
}
+static int set_stp_state(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
+{
+ br_stp_set_enabled(br, val);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static ssize_t stp_state_store(struct device *d,
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf,
size_t len)
{
- struct net_bridge *br = to_bridge(d);
- char *endp;
- unsigned long val;
-
- if (!ns_capable(dev_net(br->dev)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
- return -EPERM;
-
- val = simple_strtoul(buf, &endp, 0);
- if (endp == buf)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (!rtnl_trylock())
- return restart_syscall();
- br_stp_set_enabled(br, val);
- rtnl_unlock();
-
- return len;
+ return store_bridge_parm(d, buf, len, set_stp_state);
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(stp_state);
--
2.1.0
Toshiaki Makita
2016-Apr-05 05:08 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCHv2 net-next 3/6] bridge: simplify the stp_state_store by calling store_bridge_parm
On 2016/04/05 12:32, Xin Long wrote:> There are some repetitive codes in stp_state_store, we can remove > them by calling store_bridge_parm. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin at gmail.com> > --- > net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c | 24 +++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c > index 137cd3b..9918763 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c > @@ -128,27 +128,17 @@ static ssize_t stp_state_show(struct device *d, > } > > > +static int set_stp_state(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val) > +{You forgot to add rtnl lock here? The missing lock is restored in patch 4, but at this point bisect could break..> + br_stp_set_enabled(br, val); > + return 0; > +}Toshiaki Makita