Arnd Bergmann
2016-Feb-10 15:09 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge: mdb: avoid uninitialized variable warning
A recent change to the mdb code confused the compiler to the point where it did not realize that the port-group returned from br_mdb_add_group() is always valid when the function returns a nonzero return value, so we get a spurious warning: net/bridge/br_mdb.c: In function 'br_mdb_add': net/bridge/br_mdb.c:542:4: error: 'pg' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] __br_mdb_notify(dev, entry, RTM_NEWMDB, pg); Slightly rearranging the code in br_mdb_add_group() makes the problem go away, as gcc is clever enough to see that both functions check for 'ret != 0'. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> Fixes: 9e8430f8d60d ("bridge: mdb: Passing the port-group pointer to br_mdb module") --- net/bridge/br_mdb.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c index ac089286526e..9ab1fcd488c6 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c @@ -437,8 +437,8 @@ static int br_mdb_add_group(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *port, mp = br_mdb_ip_get(mdb, group); if (!mp) { mp = br_multicast_new_group(br, port, group); - err = PTR_ERR(mp); - if (IS_ERR(mp)) + err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(mp); + if (err) return err; } -- 2.7.0
David Miller
2016-Feb-16 20:37 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge: mdb: avoid uninitialized variable warning
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:09:02 +0100> A recent change to the mdb code confused the compiler to the point > where it did not realize that the port-group returned from > br_mdb_add_group() is always valid when the function returns a nonzero > return value, so we get a spurious warning: > > net/bridge/br_mdb.c: In function 'br_mdb_add': > net/bridge/br_mdb.c:542:4: error: 'pg' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > __br_mdb_notify(dev, entry, RTM_NEWMDB, pg); > > Slightly rearranging the code in br_mdb_add_group() makes the problem > go away, as gcc is clever enough to see that both functions check > for 'ret != 0'. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> > Fixes: 9e8430f8d60d ("bridge: mdb: Passing the port-group pointer to br_mdb module")Applied, thanks Arnd.