Jiri Pirko
2013-Dec-05 14:50 UTC
[Bridge] [patch net/stable] br: fix use of ->rx_handler_data in code executed on non-rx_handler path
br_stp_rcv() is reached by non-rx_handler path. That means there is no
guarantee that dev is bridge port and therefore simple NULL check of
->rx_handler_data is not enough. There is need to check if dev is really
bridge port and since only rcu read lock is held here, do it by checking
->rx_handler pointer.
Note that synchronize_net() in netdev_rx_handler_unregister() ensures
this approach as valid.
Introduced originally by:
commit f350a0a87374418635689471606454abc7beaa3a
"bridge: use rx_handler_data pointer to store net_bridge_port
pointer"
Fixed but not in the best way by:
commit b5ed54e94d324f17c97852296d61a143f01b227a
"bridge: fix RCU races with bridge port"
Reintroduced by:
commit 716ec052d2280d511e10e90ad54a86f5b5d4dcc2
"bridge: fix NULL pointer deref of br_port_get_rcu"
Please apply to stable trees as well. Thanks.
Reported-by: Laine Stump <laine at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us>
---
net/bridge/br_private.h | 12 ++++++++++++
net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
index 229d820..67a2d4b 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -204,6 +204,13 @@ static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rcu(const
struct net_device *d
return rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data);
}
+static inline bool br_rx_handler_check_rcu(const struct net_device *dev);
+
+static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_check_rcu(const struct
net_device *dev)
+{
+ return br_rx_handler_check_rcu(dev) ? br_port_get_rcu(dev) : NULL;
+}
+
static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rtnl(const struct net_device
*dev)
{
return br_port_exists(dev) ?
@@ -426,6 +433,11 @@ netdev_features_t br_features_recompute(struct net_bridge
*br,
int br_handle_frame_finish(struct sk_buff *skb);
rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb);
+static inline bool br_rx_handler_check_rcu(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ return rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler) == br_handle_frame;
+}
+
/* br_ioctl.c */
int br_dev_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd);
int br_ioctl_deviceless_stub(struct net *net, unsigned int cmd,
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c
index 8660ea3..bdb459d 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ void br_stp_rcv(const struct stp_proto *proto, struct
sk_buff *skb,
if (buf[0] != 0 || buf[1] != 0 || buf[2] != 0)
goto err;
- p = br_port_get_rcu(dev);
+ p = br_port_get_check_rcu(dev);
if (!p)
goto err;
--
1.8.3.1
Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-Dec-05 14:58 UTC
[Bridge] [patch net/stable] br: fix use of ->rx_handler_data in code executed on non-rx_handler path
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:50:25PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:> br_stp_rcv() is reached by non-rx_handler path. That means there is no > guarantee that dev is bridge port and therefore simple NULL check of > ->rx_handler_data is not enough. There is need to check if dev is really > bridge port and since only rcu read lock is held here, do it by checking > ->rx_handler pointer. > > Note that synchronize_net() in netdev_rx_handler_unregister() ensures > this approach as valid. > > Introduced originally by: > commit f350a0a87374418635689471606454abc7beaa3a > "bridge: use rx_handler_data pointer to store net_bridge_port pointer" > > Fixed but not in the best way by: > commit b5ed54e94d324f17c97852296d61a143f01b227a > "bridge: fix RCU races with bridge port" > > Reintroduced by: > commit 716ec052d2280d511e10e90ad54a86f5b5d4dcc2 > "bridge: fix NULL pointer deref of br_port_get_rcu" > > Please apply to stable trees as well. Thanks. > > Reported-by: Laine Stump <laine at redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us>I would also add: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025770> --- > net/bridge/br_private.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h > index 229d820..67a2d4b 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h > +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h > @@ -204,6 +204,13 @@ static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rcu(const struct net_device *d > return rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data); > } > > +static inline bool br_rx_handler_check_rcu(const struct net_device *dev);Can't we reorder functions? Forward-declaring it like this is ugly.> + > +static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_check_rcu(const struct net_device *dev) > +{ > + return br_rx_handler_check_rcu(dev) ? br_port_get_rcu(dev) : NULL; > +} > + > static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rtnl(const struct net_device *dev) > { > return br_port_exists(dev) ? > @@ -426,6 +433,11 @@ netdev_features_t br_features_recompute(struct net_bridge *br, > int br_handle_frame_finish(struct sk_buff *skb); > rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb); > > +static inline bool br_rx_handler_check_rcu(const struct net_device *dev) > +{ > + return rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler) == br_handle_frame; > +} > + > /* br_ioctl.c */ > int br_dev_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd); > int br_ioctl_deviceless_stub(struct net *net, unsigned int cmd, > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c > index 8660ea3..bdb459d 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ void br_stp_rcv(const struct stp_proto *proto, struct sk_buff *skb, > if (buf[0] != 0 || buf[1] != 0 || buf[2] != 0) > goto err; > > - p = br_port_get_rcu(dev); > + p = br_port_get_check_rcu(dev); > if (!p) > goto err; > > -- > 1.8.3.1
Eric Dumazet
2013-Dec-05 15:18 UTC
[Bridge] [patch net/stable] br: fix use of ->rx_handler_data in code executed on non-rx_handler path
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 15:50 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:> br_stp_rcv() is reached by non-rx_handler path. That means there is no > guarantee that dev is bridge port and therefore simple NULL check of > ->rx_handler_data is not enough. There is need to check if dev is really > bridge port and since only rcu read lock is held here, do it by checking > ->rx_handler pointer. > > Note that synchronize_net() in netdev_rx_handler_unregister() ensures > this approach as valid. > > Introduced originally by: > commit f350a0a87374418635689471606454abc7beaa3a > "bridge: use rx_handler_data pointer to store net_bridge_port pointer" > > Fixed but not in the best way by: > commit b5ed54e94d324f17c97852296d61a143f01b227a > "bridge: fix RCU races with bridge port" > > Reintroduced by: > commit 716ec052d2280d511e10e90ad54a86f5b5d4dcc2 > "bridge: fix NULL pointer deref of br_port_get_rcu" > > Please apply to stable trees as well. Thanks. > > Reported-by: Laine Stump <laine at redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> > --- > net/bridge/br_private.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h > index 229d820..67a2d4b 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h > +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h > @@ -204,6 +204,13 @@ static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rcu(const struct net_device *d > return rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data); > } > > +static inline bool br_rx_handler_check_rcu(const struct net_device *dev); > +Why doing this ugly forward declaration ?> +static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_check_rcu(const struct net_device *dev) > +{ > + return br_rx_handler_check_rcu(dev) ? br_port_get_rcu(dev) : NULL; > +} > + > static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rtnl(const struct net_device *dev) > { > return br_port_exists(dev) ? > @@ -426,6 +433,11 @@ netdev_features_t br_features_recompute(struct net_bridge *br, > int br_handle_frame_finish(struct sk_buff *skb); > rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb); >> +static inline bool br_rx_handler_check_rcu(const struct net_device *dev) > +{ > + return rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler) == br_handle_frame; > +}Move br_port_get_check_rcu() here ?> + > /* br_ioctl.c */ > int br_dev_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd); > int br_ioctl_deviceless_stub(struct net *net, unsigned int cmd, > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c > index 8660ea3..bdb459d 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ void br_stp_rcv(const struct stp_proto *proto, struct sk_buff *skb, > if (buf[0] != 0 || buf[1] != 0 || buf[2] != 0) > goto err; > > - p = br_port_get_rcu(dev); > + p = br_port_get_check_rcu(dev); > if (!p) > goto err; >