akpm at linux-foundation.org
2014-Dec-15 22:50 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [patch 02/15] ocfs2: free inode when i_count becomes zero
From: Xue jiufei <xuejiufei at huawei.com> Subject: ocfs2: free inode when i_count becomes zero Disk inode deletion may be heavily delayed when one node unlink a file after the same dentry is freed on another node(say N1) because of memory shrink but inode is left in memory. This inode can only be freed while N1 doing the orphan scan work. However, N1 may skip orphan scan for several times because other nodes may do the work earlier. In our tests, it may take 1 hour on 4 nodes cluster and this will cause bad user experience. So we think the inode should be freed when i_count becomes zero to avoid such circumstances. [akpm at linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei at huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh at suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec at evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> --- fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff -puN fs/ocfs2/inode.c~ocfs2-free-inode-when-i_count-becomes-zero fs/ocfs2/inode.c --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c~ocfs2-free-inode-when-i_count-becomes-zero +++ a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c @@ -1191,17 +1191,9 @@ void ocfs2_evict_inode(struct inode *ino int ocfs2_drop_inode(struct inode *inode) { struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = OCFS2_I(inode); - int res; - trace_ocfs2_drop_inode((unsigned long long)oi->ip_blkno, inode->i_nlink, oi->ip_flags); - - if (oi->ip_flags & OCFS2_INODE_MAYBE_ORPHANED) - res = 1; - else - res = generic_drop_inode(inode); - - return res; + return 1; } /* _
Xue jiufei
2014-Dec-16 01:37 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [patch 02/15] ocfs2: free inode when i_count becomes zero
Hi, Andrew, This patch may lead to data loss so please remove it from mm tree please. Here is the situation: When i_count becomes zero but there still exists dirty pages in i_mapping, the dirty pages would be freed without flushing the data. To avoid this problem, we should flush dirty page before dropping the inode, but I don't think it it a good idea to flush page in function ocfs2_drop_inode(). So now there is no better way to solve this problem. Thanks, Xuejiufei On 2014/12/16 6:50, akpm at linux-foundation.org wrote:> From: Xue jiufei <xuejiufei at huawei.com> > Subject: ocfs2: free inode when i_count becomes zero > > Disk inode deletion may be heavily delayed when one node unlink a file > after the same dentry is freed on another node(say N1) because of memory > shrink but inode is left in memory. This inode can only be freed while N1 > doing the orphan scan work. > > However, N1 may skip orphan scan for several times because other nodes may > do the work earlier. In our tests, it may take 1 hour on 4 nodes cluster > and this will cause bad user experience. So we think the inode should be > freed when i_count becomes zero to avoid such circumstances. > > [akpm at linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] > Signed-off-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei at huawei.com> > Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh at suse.com> > Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec at evilplan.org> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> > --- > > fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 10 +--------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff -puN fs/ocfs2/inode.c~ocfs2-free-inode-when-i_count-becomes-zero fs/ocfs2/inode.c > --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c~ocfs2-free-inode-when-i_count-becomes-zero > +++ a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c > @@ -1191,17 +1191,9 @@ void ocfs2_evict_inode(struct inode *ino > int ocfs2_drop_inode(struct inode *inode) > { > struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = OCFS2_I(inode); > - int res; > - > trace_ocfs2_drop_inode((unsigned long long)oi->ip_blkno, > inode->i_nlink, oi->ip_flags); > - > - if (oi->ip_flags & OCFS2_INODE_MAYBE_ORPHANED) > - res = 1; > - else > - res = generic_drop_inode(inode); > - > - return res; > + return 1; > } > > /* > _ > . >