James Y Knight via llvm-dev
2021-Nov-22 17:01 UTC
[llvm-dev] IMPORTANT: LLVM Bugzilla migration
Looking at the PDF you posted on the other thread, it appears that users who did not fill out the migration google-sheet have their comments migrated with no author-attribution of any kind (not name, not username, or even "Anonymous LLVM Contributor #123". Is that correct? Thus, it seems pretty important that at least all of the active contributors have filled out the sheet before the migration -- have they? What % of contributors will be converted with comment attribution? (or maybe better: what percent of comments are by someone who filled out the migration sheet vs anonymous?) I imagine it'd be pretty easy for folks to forget that they didn't fill out the sheet, since there's no way to verify whether you did or not. On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 5:54 AM Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Dear Fellow LLVM'ers, > > I'm happy to announce that we were able to find workarounds for the > vast majority of GitHub limitations and our dry import went > successfully. > > Therefore, the following migration roadmap is proposed: > > 1. We will put Bugzilla in read-only mode on Wednesday, November 24 > 23:59 Pacific Time. This will be the last chance to submit the > bugzilla username => github username mapping. > 2. We will download the data from Bugzilla and prepare the final > "migration dump" on Thursday, November 25. > 3. We will perform the actual migration on November 26 - November 27 > and verify the results > 4. If everything will go smoothly, we will open the LLVM GitHub repo > for issues no later than on Monday, November 29. Bugzilla will remain > in read-only mode after the migration. > > Please DO NOT submit any issues to LLVM github repo during the > migration as it might interfere with the migration process. > > Please let me know if there are any objections to this schedule. > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > On behalf of the LLVM Foundation, > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211122/af084b77/attachment.html>
Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev
2021-Nov-22 17:42 UTC
[llvm-dev] IMPORTANT: LLVM Bugzilla migration
> Looking at the PDF you posted on the other thread, it appears that users who did not fill out the migration google-sheet have their comments migrated with no author-attribution of any kind (not name, not username, or even "Anonymous LLVM Contributor #123". Is that correct?That's correct. All such contributions will be attributed to "llvmbot". There is no other way we can enter "anonymous" data to github. However, we do provide the backlink to the original bz issue. We have to anonymize the data in order to comply with some regulations and there is no way to save the attribution without the explicit consent.> Thus, it seems pretty important that at least all of the active contributors have filled out the sheet before the migration -- have they?There are more than 1k users with commit access to LLVM repo. Approximately half of them filled the survey. However, there is no way we can force the contributor to give consent.> What % of contributors will be converted with comment attribution? (or maybe better: what percent of comments are by someone who filled out the migration sheet vs anonymous?)I do not have such information. There are no plans to make such an estimation.> I imagine it'd be pretty easy for folks to forget that they didn't fill out the sheet, since there's no way to verify whether you did or not.I emailed all contributors that were active (submitted a single bug / comment) over the last 5 years but who did not fill the bz survey back in April (after the deadline for the form expired). So, all of them were notified. We also notified multiple times over the mailing list. I think it's enough – everyone who cared about "saving" the contributions would've filled the form by now. So far there are ~2450 entries there. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University