llvm dev - Dec 2021 - Preparing BOLT for LLVM monorepo

Hi Maksim,

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:52 PM Maksim Panchenko <maks at fb.com>
wrote:
> We are still working on finalizing the exact logistics of the merge.
>
> However, we expect to follow the Flang project's footsteps and run the
>
> "--no-ff" merge to preserve the history of ~1K commits. We would
like to
>
> ask for help and coordination from the release managers Tom Stellard and
>
> Hans Wennborg.
I'm no longer involved in release management, and don't really have
any opinion on how to merge this.

Thanks,
Hans

Hi folks,

https://github.com/facebookincubator/BOLT branch “main” contains a merge
proposal of BOLT into llvm-project. This is llvm from Nov 30th with 1016 commits
on top of it corresponding to the BOLT project.

These 1016 commits would ideally be committed in a merge commit, merging LLVM as
the first parent and BOLT as the second, and would be there only for the
purposes of preserving project history. In this way, they should be easily
skippable during a bisect of LLVM in the same way as the merge commit of flang.
These commits represent the linear history of BOLT on top of rebased LLVM, so
most commits are not buildable (since we can’t build a very old version of BOLT
on top of a recent LLVM base). That’s why this is for history/blame only.

We have addressed the issues in
https://github.com/facebookincubator/BOLT/issues/248 and we are happy to
continue working on any extra suggestions.

Would it be better if we put this branch as a PR into llvm-project as a way to
make it easier for people to review it? I don’t think we can put this into
phabricator. However, I guess github’s bot will probably auto-close the PR. Also
feel free to open new issues against our facebookincubator/BOLT project as a way
to review it.

Thanks

From: Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>
Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 5:42 AM
To: Maksim Panchenko <maks at fb.com>
Cc: Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com>, Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray
at google.com>, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram at google.com>, Chris Lattner
<clattner at llvm.org>, Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at
gmail.com>, Rafael Auler <rafaelauler at fb.com>, vladislav.khmelevskyi
at huawei.com <vladislav.khmelevskyi at huawei.com>, tstellar at
redhat.com <tstellar at redhat.com>, joker.eph at gmail.com <joker.eph
at gmail.com>, echristo at gmail.com <echristo at gmail.com>, Nick
Desaulniers <ndesaulniers at google.com>, llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: Preparing BOLT for LLVM monorepo
Hi Maksim,

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:52 PM Maksim Panchenko <maks at fb.com>
wrote:
> We are still working on finalizing the exact logistics of the merge.
>
> However, we expect to follow the Flang project's footsteps and run the
>
> "--no-ff" merge to preserve the history of ~1K commits. We would
like to
>
> ask for help and coordination from the release managers Tom Stellard and
>
> Hans Wennborg.
I'm no longer involved in release management, and don't really have
any opinion on how to merge this.

Thanks,
Hans
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211208/9ff64724/attachment.html>