Shorewall users - Nov 2003 - Sourceforge updates, webmin

Great piece of software there...
Just a few minor problems.

First, the sourceforge site doesn''t seem to be kept up to date. This
should be pointed out more (Sourceforge probably shouldn''t be the first
mirror either). It caused me some long hours trying to solve a bug in
1.4.6, thinking this was the latest version, when in fact this bug was
solved in 1.4.8 (routeback for if+).

Second, an even more cosmetic bug ;)
Routeback isn''t included in the list of options in interfaces (the
file).

And lastly, the only part I actually want a reply to ;). Is there any
development on the webmin interface? The one included with the
webmin-dist. isn''t up to date at all... :/

PS. I''m not subscribing to this list so I''d appreciate if
you''d cc any
replies.

--

Pierre Ossman

OpenPGP key provided at http://www.keyserver.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/attachments/20031108/7b69c34e/attachment.bin

On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Great piece of software there...
> Just a few minor problems.
>
> First, the sourceforge site doesn''t seem to be kept up to date.
This
> should be pointed out more (Sourceforge probably shouldn''t be the
first
> mirror either). It caused me some long hours trying to solve a bug in
> 1.4.6, thinking this was the latest version, when in fact this bug was
> solved in 1.4.8 (routeback for if+).
>
I''ve removed Sourceforge from the download list. Last night when I was
releasing Shorewall 1.4.8, the Sourceforge site was completely down.
> Second, an even more cosmetic bug ;)
> Routeback isn''t included in the list of options in interfaces (the
> file).
Oops -- Francesca: I''ve included the following in my version just above
        ''arp_filter'':

#		routeback    - If specified, indicates that Shorewall
#			       should include rules that allow filtering
#			       traffic arriving on this interface back
#			       out that same interface.

>
> And lastly, the only part I actually want a reply to ;). Is there any
> development on the webmin interface? The one included with the
> webmin-dist. isn''t up to date at all... :/
I don''t know -- I have nothing to do with the development and support
of
the webmin interface.

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ teastep@shorewall.net