I accidentaly re-ripped some of my CDs and did take this as a chance to do some
comparison. Here is what I have found for on of the songs.
Peak level 100.0%
Track quality 100.0%
Copy CRC C8F5065F
Track not present in database
Used drive : _NEC DVD_RW ND-3500AG Adapter: 0 ID: 1
Read mode : Secure with NO C2, accurate stream, disable cache
Combined read/write offset correction : 0
Overread into Lead-In and Lead-Out : Yes
Additional command line options : --best -V -T "artist=%a" -T
"title=%t" -T "album=%g" -T "date=%y" -T
"tracknumber=%n" -T "genre=%m" -T "comment=EAC
0.95beta2 / FLAC 1.1.2 --best" %s
Peak level 99.1%
Track quality 99.9%
Copy CRC DFD55D78
Accurately ripped (confidence 6) [60892C93]
Copy OK
Used drive : _NEC DVD_RW ND-3500AG Adapter: 1 ID: 0
Read mode : Secure
Utilize accurate stream : Yes
Defeat audio cache : No
Make use of C2 pointers : Yes
Read offset correction : 48
Overread into Lead-In and Lead-Out : Yes
Fill up missing offset samples with silence : Yes
Delete leading and trailing silent blocks : No
Null samples used in CRC calculations : Yes
Used interface : Native Win32 interface for Win NT
& 2000
Gap handling : Not detected, thus appended to
previous track
Additional command line options : --best -V -T "artist=%a" -T
"title=%t" -T "album=%g" -T "date=%y" -T
"tracknumber=%n" -T "genre=%m" -T comment="%e" -T
"comment=EAC (Secure Mode)" %s
When I decompress the first one the file size is 50,826,764 bytes vs.
50,869,100 bytes for the second one. The first one definitely seems to be
accurate according to the result. I assume the second one should be as well
because all song are reported as Accurately ripped (confidence 6). So then why
do I get different sizes when decompression the flac files?
Thanks
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20080316/8ff6c481/attachment.htm
