TIMMERMANS ANDRE
2005-May-31 08:11 UTC
[ogg-dev] Re: libogg2 branch->trunk (deadline: 5/30)
I have no objection to the API in itself, but could the API and structure only use the ogg fundamental types (like ogg_int32_t) or even better the C99 official types (like int32_t) because at the moment there is a real mix of types used for the occurences of serialno (long, int, ogg_uint32_t), beos, eos, ... Andr? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/ogg-dev/attachments/20050531/36e1ada8/attachment.htm
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:54:27PM +0200, TIMMERMANS ANDRE wrote:> I have no objection to the API in itself, but could the API and structure > only use the ogg fundamental types > (like ogg_int32_t) or even better the C99 official types (like int32_t) > because at the moment there is > a real mix of types used for the occurences of serialno (long, int, > ogg_uint32_t), beos, eos, ...That's a very good suggestion. Unless I find something wrong with the idea, I'll make the switch soon. -- Diversity is the Fuel of Evolution, Conformity it's Starvation. Be Radical. Be New. Be Different. Feed Evolution with Everything You Are.