--- Bernd Löhr <B.Loehr@hermstedt.de> wrote:> Hi, > > I am using the FLAC encoder and decoder lib in it's integer only > version (FLAC__INTEGER_ONLY_LIBRARY) on a PPC405 system. > > I encounter complete different behaviour when setting random playback > > positions while decoding different flac encoded files. > If they have been encoded on a PC, repositioning within the file > works > flawlessly. If we do the same on files encoded with the integer > version > on our device, positioning doesn't work well - it seems, as if it > needs > a lot more time to get in to sync again if the files have been > encoded > with 1.1.2 integer only. > > Is that possible? Any idea?I guess it's possible, the integerized flavor is kind of new. I'll look into it... Josh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Hello Josh, did you find anything regarding the seek behaviour? Thanks Bernd Am 27.04.2005 um 18:31 schrieb Josh Coalson:> --- Bernd L?hr <B.Loehr@hermstedt.de> wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> I am using the FLAC encoder and decoder lib in it's integer only >> version (FLAC__INTEGER_ONLY_LIBRARY) on a PPC405 system. >> >> I encounter complete different behaviour when setting random playback >> >> positions while decoding different flac encoded files. >> If they have been encoded on a PC, repositioning within the file >> works >> flawlessly. If we do the same on files encoded with the integer >> version >> on our device, positioning doesn't work well - it seems, as if it >> needs >> a lot more time to get in to sync again if the files have been >> encoded >> with 1.1.2 integer only. >> >> Is that possible? Any idea? >> >> > > I guess it's possible, the integerized flavor is kind of new. > I'll look into it... > > Josh > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > >
not yet, hoping to carve out some time for a bunch of FLAC work in september. Josh --- Bernd L?hr <B.Loehr@hermstedt.de> wrote:> Hello Josh, > > did you find anything regarding the seek behaviour? > > Thanks > > Bernd > > > Am 27.04.2005 um 18:31 schrieb Josh Coalson: > > > > --- Bernd L?hr <B.Loehr@hermstedt.de> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am using the FLAC encoder and decoder lib in it's integer only > >> version (FLAC__INTEGER_ONLY_LIBRARY) on a PPC405 system. > >> > >> I encounter complete different behaviour when setting random > playback > >> > >> positions while decoding different flac encoded files. > >> If they have been encoded on a PC, repositioning within the file > >> works > >> flawlessly. If we do the same on files encoded with the integer > >> version > >> on our device, positioning doesn't work well - it seems, as if it > >> needs > >> a lot more time to get in to sync again if the files have been > >> encoded > >> with 1.1.2 integer only. > >> > >> Is that possible? Any idea? > >> > >> > > > > I guess it's possible, the integerized flavor is kind of new. > > I'll look into it... > > > > Josh__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com