Well, please explain what you would expect from a "thread safe" codec
when you encode two frames at a time from the same encoder.
Jean-Marc
On 11-12-05 11:56 PM, ???. wrote:> yes? you are right.but its not one instance of codec.
>
>
> ------------------ ???? ------------------
> *???:* "Jean-Marc Valin"<jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>;
> *????:* 2011?12?6?(???) ??12:52
> *???:* "speex-dev"<speex-dev at xiph.org>;
> *??:* Re: [Speex-dev] (no subject)
>
> Actually, it *is* thread safe as long as you don't use the *same* state
> at the same time from two calls. i.e. you can easily encode two
> different streams from two different threads.
>
> Jean-Marc
>
> On 11-12-01 04:55 AM, ???. wrote:
>> it.s not safe.
>>
>>
>> ------------------ Original ------------------
>> *From: * "????? ?????????"<romius99 at mail.ru>;
>> *Date: * Thu, Dec 1, 2011 04:43 PM
>> *To: * "speex-dev"<speex-dev at xiph.org>;
>> *Subject: * [Speex-dev] (no subject)
>>
>> Hi.
>> Is the speexlib thread safe?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Speex-dev mailing list
>> Speex-dev at xiph.org
>> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Speex-dev mailing list
>> Speex-dev at xiph.org
>> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev