Quirion, Jean
2007-Jul-19 05:16 UTC
[Speex-dev] How Can I Get involved in Speex Fixed-Point Development?
Hi, My name is Jean Quirion and I am a DSP engineer. Currently I am working on a project where it is desired to implement a VoIP solution over a GSM GPRS link. I would like to use Speex as the vocoder for this application. This application would require the Speex encoder/decoder and possibly the pre-processor to run on a low power fixed-point DSP such as a TI C55x. Thus, I am interested in getting involved in the fixed-point implementation of Speex. I feel I can contribute significantly to the Speex project while effectively developing a vocoder solution for my project. Can you tell me how I can get started? I looked at the list of tasks on the Seepx wiki and I find that the following would be best suited for my interests: Complete fixed-point (DSP development) * Rest of the narrowband modes * Preprocessor (noise suppression, AGC) * Jitter buffer Please let me know how to move forward. Where does the Speex vocoder fixed-point implementation stands? Has if been successfully ported and tested onto a TI DSP evaluation board (i.e. an EVM)? If not, and if it can be helpful, I would be interested in tackling that task... Sincerely, Jean Quirion -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20070719/5b461cbc/attachment.html
Jim Crichton
2007-Jul-19 07:03 UTC
[Speex-dev] How Can I Get involved in Speex Fixed-PointDevelopment?
There is a port for the TI C55X, in the TI directory of the source tree. This builds and runs directly on the TI C55x simulator (Code Composer). I have run this on the Spectrum Digital C5509A EVMPLUS board, by modifying some of the sample audio drivers (I could provide some details if you chose that board). You can certainly get started in the simulator. The Speex port does not include any assembly optimization for TI, so that is an area that you might be interested in. If you are considering the Speex echo canceller, that could greatly benefit from a TI-optimized FFT. I have not used the preprocessor myself. You should plan on providing external memory for your DSP if you are doing more than the basic codec. Speex runs fairly efficiently in C on TI DSPs, but it has a big footprint. I hope this in helpful in getting started with the DSP target. I will defer to Jean-Marc on how to contribute to the project. Regards, Jim Crichton ----- Original Message ----- From: Quirion, Jean To: speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 8:04 AM Subject: [Speex-dev] How Can I Get involved in Speex Fixed-PointDevelopment? Hi, My name is Jean Quirion and I am a DSP engineer. Currently I am working on a project where it is desired to implement a VoIP solution over a GSM GPRS link. I would like to use Speex as the vocoder for this application. This application would require the Speex encoder/decoder and possibly the pre-processor to run on a low power fixed-point DSP such as a TI C55x. Thus, I am interested in getting involved in the fixed-point implementation of Speex. I feel I can contribute significantly to the Speex project while effectively developing a vocoder solution for my project. Can you tell me how I can get started? I looked at the list of tasks on the Seepx wiki and I find that the following would be best suited for my interests: Complete fixed-point (DSP development) . Rest of the narrowband modes . Preprocessor (noise suppression, AGC) . Jitter buffer Please let me know how to move forward. Where does the Speex vocoder fixed-point implementation stands? Has if been successfully ported and tested onto a TI DSP evaluation board (i.e. an EVM)? If not, and if it can be helpful, I would be interested in tackling that task. Sincerely, Jean Quirion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Speex-dev mailing list Speex-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20070719/16b79a08/attachment.htm
Jean Quirion
2007-Jul-20 11:30 UTC
[Speex-dev] Porting Speex on C5509A and CELP Algorithm Documentation
Jim, Thank you very much for your suggestions. I managed to get the C55x code working on the simulator. I would like to port Speex both on a C5502 EVM and a C5509A EVM. As such, if you can provide me with the details of your port on the C5509A, it would be greatly appreciated. Furthermore, I am looking for some technical documentation on the CELP algorithms. I would like to better understand the math being implemented. Do you know where such documentation can be found? Sincerely, Jean Quirion _____ From: Jim Crichton [mailto:jim.crichton@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:54 AM To: Quirion, Jean; speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] How Can I Get involved in Speex Fixed-PointDevelopment? There is a port for the TI C55X, in the TI directory of the source tree. This builds and runs directly on the TI C55x simulator (Code Composer). I have run this on the Spectrum Digital C5509A EVMPLUS board, by modifying some of the sample audio drivers (I could provide some details if you chose that board). You can certainly get started in the simulator. The Speex port does not include any assembly optimization for TI, so that is an area that you might be interested in. If you are considering the Speex echo canceller, that could greatly benefit from a TI-optimized FFT. I have not used the preprocessor myself. You should plan on providing external memory for your DSP if you are doing more than the basic codec. Speex runs fairly efficiently in C on TI DSPs, but it has a big footprint. I hope this in helpful in getting started with the DSP target. I will defer to Jean-Marc on how to contribute to the project. Regards, Jim Crichton ----- Original Message ----- From: Quirion, <mailto:jquirion@orion.ns.ca> Jean To: speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 8:04 AM Subject: [Speex-dev] How Can I Get involved in Speex Fixed-PointDevelopment? Hi, My name is Jean Quirion and I am a DSP engineer. Currently I am working on a project where it is desired to implement a VoIP solution over a GSM GPRS link. I would like to use Speex as the vocoder for this application. This application would require the Speex encoder/decoder and possibly the pre-processor to run on a low power fixed-point DSP such as a TI C55x. Thus, I am interested in getting involved in the fixed-point implementation of Speex. I feel I can contribute significantly to the Speex project while effectively developing a vocoder solution for my project. Can you tell me how I can get started? I looked at the list of tasks on the Seepx wiki and I find that the following would be best suited for my interests: Complete fixed-point (DSP development) . Rest of the narrowband modes . Preprocessor (noise suppression, AGC) . Jitter buffer Please let me know how to move forward. Where does the Speex vocoder fixed-point implementation stands? Has if been successfully ported and tested onto a TI DSP evaluation board (i.e. an EVM)? If not, and if it can be helpful, I would be interested in tackling that task. Sincerely, Jean Quirion _____ _______________________________________________ Speex-dev mailing list Speex-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20070720/4dc99704/attachment-0001.htm
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Porting Speex on C5509A and CELP Algorithm Documentation
- How Can I Get involved in Speex Fixed-PointDevelopment?
- Updated MIPs and memory requirements for TI c54x or c55 DSPs
- Updated MIPs and memory requirements for TI c54x or c55DSPs
- Implementation of a Speex based hardware VOCODER