similar to: How Can I Get involved in Speex Fixed-Point Development?

Jim, Thank you very much for your suggestions. I managed to get the C55x code working on the simulator. I would like to port Speex both on a C5502 EVM and a C5509A EVM. As such, if you can provide me with the details of your port on the C5509A, it would be greatly appreciated. Furthermore, I am looking for some technical documentation on the CELP algorithms. I would like to better

There is a port for the TI C55X, in the TI directory of the source tree. This builds and runs directly on the TI C55x simulator (Code Composer). I have run this on the Spectrum Digital C5509A EVMPLUS board, by modifying some of the sample audio drivers (I could provide some details if you chose that board). You can certainly get started in the simulator. The Speex port does not include any

Hi, I can see that there has been some effort to compile the SPEEX codec to operate on the TI c54x and c55x DSPs and I am wondering if anyone would be able to update the mailing list with their current MIPs and Memory resource requirements for their c54x and/or c55x compilation? The only estimate I was able to find in the mailing list archive was 42MIPs but I'm not sure if this is an

Hi, Just a couple tips to reduce complexity. First, I think you'd get a good speedup by enabling the PRECISION16 switch (if it's not done already). This (very) slightly reduces quality, but means you convert a lot of "emulated" 16x32 multiplications into 16x16. There are also several routines that would benefit from platform-specific optimizations. There are already

Hi everyone, I?m a graduate student in a Brazilian Intitute of Technology, and I?m doing some academic research regarding secure voice transmission over phone lines. One of our reserach goals is to implement a hardware vocoder, with low bit rates, and a preferably free algorithm, to be used in this secure voice system. Actually, there is a functional system using a proprietary AMBE

-----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 6:38 PM To: Michael Shatz Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain >> Yes, data footprint in the new version is quite manageable. Still I would >> wish better documentation for speex_alloc_scratch(). >

Hi Randy, Thanks for reply. I have one question though. While compiling the speex (downloaded from http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/speex/speex-1.2rc1.tar.gz), I gave ./configure -enable-ti-c55x option and then built the library through make and make install using cygwin. In this case, I get this error "error: member "bits.o" of archive

Hello, I'm interested in a low rate vocoder to run on SA-1110 or XScale processor (for PDAs voice application). Is there a suitable speex vocoder for that? Thanks in advance, Eyal. ________________________________________________ Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag --- >8 ---- List archives:

Hi Jim, > Build 11169 in SVN works correctly. Good. I'll try not to forget the EXTEND32 from now on. > I have attached a zip file (renamed > .txt) with a patch to bits.c to make the byteswapping for TI DSPs > consistent. Seems like unzip can't read it. Either it's in an unknown format or the file got corrupted. Could simply send as multiple (uncompressed)

for the bits init I am using speex_bits_set_bit_buffer and I don't use the write to or read from because the data is already in the buffer I am reading from and I am writing to the final buffer so I don't need to move arrays around. what part is the vocoder part of the decode? Thanks for your help! -Mike >>> Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> 08/06/07

-This is my 'sip.conf' file: ;************************************************************* ; ; SIP Configuration for Asterisk ; [general] port = 5060 ; Port to bind to bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ; Address to bind to context = default ; Default for incoming calls tos=184 maxexpirey=3600 ; Max length of incoming registration we allow

Hi, I found this message concerning VAD and was wondering whether VAD has been ported to fixed-point in the latest version? Thanks, SingHui ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@usherbrooke.ca> Date: Jul 22, 2005 1:02 AM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Fixed-point To: gue baja <gue_baja@yahoo.com> Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Hi Baja, Here's a quick

Jean-Marc, Last week I tried the SVN code (build 11700) on the TI C55x DSP, and found that operation was broken again. I traced this to build 11522, committed on 5 June. The problem is in lsp.c, function lsp_to_lpc(). The line (lsp.c line 461 in build 11700): xin = 1<<(QIMP-1); /* 0.5 in QIMP format */ evaluates to zero. The following change corrects the problem: xin =

I was wondering if the developers were using anything to "objectively" test the quality of the speex vocoder. For instance PSQM or one of the many derivatives. Mean Opinion Scoring seems an expensive route. Is there some open source software to use for this? <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To

Jim Crichton a ?crit : > I played briefly with the echo canceller on the C5509A back in May > 2006. I got the same compiler warnings, and sent a message to the > list which included this: > > "I got several compiler warnings for "shift out of range" in mdf.c, > which I fixed by adding EXTEND32 to all of the SHL32s with 16 bit > operands (st->frame_size in 6

Hi, I need to get an overview over the memory/speed requirements for speex. We want to investigate whether we can implement on a target processor with limited resources. The target processor is a 16 bit fixed pint DSP with a single ALU and MAC. It runs at 60 MHz and has a total of 16 Kbytes RAM from which other processing also will eat. What we would like to implement is a speex encoder and

The attached file contains build files for TI's Code Composer Studio (CCS) for the C54x, C55x, and C6x DSPs. I had intended to post this a couple of months ago, but it took a long time to get around to doing the little bit of cleanup required. This is a file I/O loopback application suitable for running with the CCS simulators, for evaluating memory and MIPs requirements for these

Thanks Jim for looking into that, I was really starting to wonder what was going on. Let me know if you find a way to tell the compiler to stop complaining. Jean-Marc Jim Crichton a ?crit : > I looked back at my old C55 EC build, and I had the same warning in > mdf.c which Mike found. The assembly code did have a valid shift, and > this build did cancel echo. > > When I built

Greetings, I'm looking how I can set manually the GID & UID of my Active Directory users into Samba & Winbind. I have several server linux using Samba and they are linked to Active Directory to get users & groups. On all my Linux system I did a "net join ads". Also I set this option in all smb.conf: idmap uid = 20000-30000 idmap gid =

Dear all, I'm having problem with samba 3.0.23c. The smbd process will crash when I have the following definition for a specific share: [user1] comment = User1 Home Directory path = /u/management/user1 valid users = domain+user1,sher+user2 force user = domain+user1 force group = sher+management read only = no create mask = 0660