-----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Thorvald Natvig Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 12:11 PM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Who is using the jitter buffer? But I must say that it really does work well at the moment, at least from the "minimizing latency" point of view :) How do you timestamp the packets before putting them into the jitter buffer? Do you use the PC clock? Thanks, .a
> How do you timestamp the packets before putting them into > the jitter buffer? Do you use the PC clock?The timestamps always increment by 160 (samples) in narrowband and 32 in wideband. It's like using the capture soundcard as clock. Note that the timestamps send and the timestamps received don't need to be the same (they can't anyway). Jean-Marc
http://mumble.sourceforge.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Marc Valin" <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca> To: "Alex Bakaev" <Alex.Bakaev@citrix.com> Cc: <speex-dev@xiph.org> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:21 PM Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Who is using the jitter buffer?>> How do you timestamp the packets before putting them into >> the jitter buffer? Do you use the PC clock? > > The timestamps always increment by 160 (samples) in narrowband and 32 in > wideband. It's like using the capture soundcard as clock. Note that the > timestamps send and the timestamps received don't need to be the same > (they can't anyway). > > Jean-Marc > _______________________________________________ > Speex-dev mailing list > Speex-dev@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev >