Speex dev - Jan 2005 - Bug#292548: libspeex1: speex 1.1 in unstable?

Mikael Magnusson writes:
 > Package: libspeex1
 > Version: 1.1.6-1
 > Severity: wishlist
 > 
 > Is there anything that keeps 1.1.6-1 in experimental from being uploaded
to
 > unstable? Do you know when it will happen?
 > 
 > I'm debianizing iaxclient, which needs speex version 1.1.x. Currently
I'm
 > using 1.1.6-1 in experimental, which is working fine.
 > 
 > Regards,
 > Mikael Magnusson

Sounds like we have working code. Now I'd just like to drum up
a little more rough consensus.

Is there any objection in the speex and Debian voip community
to having the Debian distribution based upon speex 1.1.6?

I'm inclined to go ahead with 1.1.6 because we've had six months
to see that it does the right things. But I'd like to talk it up
before doing it.

-Maitland

Hi,

My opinion is that 1.1.x should be safe for inclusion in unstable.
Although I'm not ready to make it the new stable version, all issues
I've seen so far are related to fixed-point or the preprocessor. None of
those are regressions since 1.0.x.

	Jean-Marc

Le jeudi 27 janvier 2005 ? 17:26 -0500, A. Maitland Bottoms a ?crit
:
> Mikael Magnusson writes:
>  > Package: libspeex1
>  > Version: 1.1.6-1
>  > Severity: wishlist
>  > 
>  > Is there anything that keeps 1.1.6-1 in experimental from being
uploaded to
>  > unstable? Do you know when it will happen?
>  > 
>  > I'm debianizing iaxclient, which needs speex version 1.1.x.
Currently I'm
>  > using 1.1.6-1 in experimental, which is working fine.
>  > 
>  > Regards,
>  > Mikael Magnusson
> 
> Sounds like we have working code. Now I'd just like to drum up
> a little more rough consensus.
> 
> Is there any objection in the speex and Debian voip community
> to having the Debian distribution based upon speex 1.1.6?
> 
> I'm inclined to go ahead with 1.1.6 because we've had six months
> to see that it does the right things. But I'd like to talk it up
> before doing it.
> 
> -Maitland
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev@xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> 
-- 
Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@USherbrooke.ca>
Universit? de Sherbrooke

Hi Maitland,
> Is there any objection in the speex and Debian voip community
> to having the Debian distribution based upon speex 1.1.6?
If that speex 1.1.6 doesn't break our networked codec specs, then go for
it. If there's however a different internal codec design with identical
external names, then this should be addressed and a clean transition
should be made up first.
I remember that from 0.9 to 1.0 IIRC this was an issue. But except from
that i don't see any problems from the voip side.

-- 
Best regards,
 Kilian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url :
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20050128/81ea5795/attachment.pgp