Bobby Santiago
2008-May-23 02:21 UTC
[Backgroundrb-devel] Backgroundrb-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 7
Hi, all. Just wondering if anyone has tried using the Paperclip file upload plugin with Backgroundrb. My current implementation uses attachment_fu - I save the file initially to the file system without generating thumbs, then a bdrb process picks up that file, generates thumbs, and saves to S3. This works fine and dandy, the only hitch is I want to save image metadata in the same table as my model (User, in this case), which is how Paperclip does it. My question is, how would you pass off file uploading/thumbnail generation/S3 upload to a background process using Paperclip? Bobby On May 22, 2008, at 9:34 PM, backgroundrb-devel-request at rubyforge.org wrote:> Send Backgroundrb-devel mailing list submissions to > backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to > backgroundrb-devel-request at rubyforge.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > backgroundrb-devel-owner at rubyforge.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Backgroundrb-devel digest..." > > > Today''s Topics: > > 1. Does backgroundrb support SSL? (Jim Salinas) > 2. Re: Does backgroundrb support SSL? (Jim Salinas) > 3. Re: How to know the environment (development/test/production) > inside a worker (Ryan Leavengood) > 4. Re: Does backgroundrb support SSL? (Ryan Leavengood) > 5. Re: Schedule write errors? (Joel Chippindale) > 6. Re: Does backgroundrb support SSL? (Jim Salinas) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:18:54 -0500 > From: "Jim Salinas" <salinas.j at gmail.com> > Subject: [Backgroundrb-devel] Does backgroundrb support SSL? > To: backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <834fa2620805211518k568156cj3b3975538c9bd8d6 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Does backgroundrb support SSL like drb? I was unable to find any > sample > configurations including SSL. Any help would be appreciated, thanks. > -jim > salinas > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/backgroundrb-devel/attachments/20080521/9588825a/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:58:16 -0500 > From: "Jim Salinas" <salinas.j at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Backgroundrb-devel] Does backgroundrb support SSL? > To: "David Masover" <dave at 3mix.com>, backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <834fa2620805211558x7c441bclbc358e3a4f51f544 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Thanks for replay David, I just did a search and only found a > mention of drb > in a unit test and from digging around backgroundrb seems to have been > rewritten recently without drb. If this incorrect, someone please > correct > me. :-) > > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:30 PM, David Masover <dave at 3mix.com> wrote: > >> I asked this question almost a month ago, and got no answer. >> backgroundrb >> does use drb as a backend, but I see no way to configure SSL, or Unix >> sockets, even though drb supports both. >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Jim Salinas <salinas.j at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Does backgroundrb support SSL like drb? I was unable to find any >>> sample >>> configurations including SSL. Any help would be appreciated, >>> thanks. -jim >>> salinas >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Backgroundrb-devel mailing list >>> Backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org >>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel >>> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/backgroundrb-devel/attachments/20080521/723b3696/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 01:05:23 -0400 > From: "Ryan Leavengood" <leavengood at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Backgroundrb-devel] How to know the environment > (development/test/production) inside a worker > To: "Sarat Kongara" <saratkongara at gmail.com> > Cc: backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <a4855ac50805212205l4c337ffdl19eb0594bcd3c731 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 5/21/08, Sarat Kongara <saratkongara at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I am not sure how to figure out the environment with which the >> backgroundRb >> is started from inside a worker task. Any help is appreciated. >> Thanks for >> your time. > > ENV["RAILS_ENV"] is defined properly inside the workers. > > Ryan > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 01:14:22 -0400 > From: "Ryan Leavengood" <leavengood at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Backgroundrb-devel] Does backgroundrb support SSL? > To: "Jim Salinas" <salinas.j at gmail.com> > Cc: backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <a4855ac50805212214j437094a4j9f24ba3382db90b0 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 5/21/08, Jim Salinas <salinas.j at gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks for replay David, I just did a search and only found a >> mention of drb >> in a unit test and from digging around backgroundrb seems to have >> been >> rewritten recently without drb. If this incorrect, someone please >> correct >> me. :-) > > BackgrounDRb has not used DRb for sometime, the name is just a bit > misleading now ;) > > It was switched to use a event framework a while ago and more recently > has switched to the pure Ruby ''packet'' library. > > As far as I can tell packet does not support SSL, but I am far from an > expert on the subject. I assume you have some sensitive data you need > to pass to BackgrounDRb from Rails that you don''t want in the clear? > > Maybe you could just use the database to pass that information, only > passing database IDs or unique tokens to BackgrounDRb for it to load > the information. Of course depending on your database the information > may still get passed around in the clear... > > Ryan > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 12:08:57 +0100 > From: "Joel Chippindale" <joel.chippindale at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Backgroundrb-devel] Schedule write errors? > To: hemant <gethemant at gmail.com> > Cc: backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <4c647b520805220408x56fced59saab5bd325146f745 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Thanks very much for this, it seems to have resolved the problem very > nicely. > J. > 2008/5/21 hemant <gethemant at gmail.com>: > >> Look in the mail previous mail by Mike also see my response. You can >> try out git versions of packet and backgroundrb and see if this fixes >> your problem. >> >> >> http://gnufied.org/2008/05/21/bleeding-edge-version-of-backgroundrb-for-better-memory-usage/ >> >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Joel Chippindale >> <joel.chippindale at gmail.com> wrote: >>> My BackgrounDRb server intermittently bails out with the following >> exception >>> in the middle of a long running task running on a Worker sub classed >>> from BackgrounDRb::MetaWorker (the point at which it raises this >> exception >>> is different each time it runs) >>> >> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/ >> packet_core.rb:145:in >>> `schedule_write'': You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! >>> (NoMethodError) >>> The error occurred while evaluating nil.instance from >>> >> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/ >> packet_nbio.rb:57:in >>> `write_and_schedule'' >>> from >>> >> /Users/joel/git/deathstar/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/../../ >> activesupport/lib/active_support/whiny_nil.rb:35:in >>> `each_with_index'' >>> from >>> >> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/ >> packet_nbio.rb:51:in >>> `each'' >>> from >>> >> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/ >> packet_nbio.rb:51:in >>> `each_with_index'' >>> from >>> >> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/ >> packet_nbio.rb:51:in >>> `write_and_schedule'' >>> from >>> >> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/ >> packet_nbio.rb:72:in >>> `dump_object'' >>> from >>> >> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/ >> packet_worker.rb:31:in >>> `send_data'' >>> from >>> >> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/ >> packet_worker.rb:40:in >>> `send_request'' >>> ... 23 levels... >>> from >>> >> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/ >> packet_master.rb:20:in >>> `run'' >>> from >>> >> /Users/joel/git/deathstar/vendor/plugins/backgroundrb/server/lib/ >> master_worker.rb:166:in >>> `initialize'' >>> from script/backgroundrb:60:in `new'' >>> from script/backgroundrb:60 >>> I am running BackgrounDRb (r 324 from the subversion repository), >>> with >>> packet v 0.1.5 on OS X. >>> Any suggestions for resolving this problem are welcomed. >>> J. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Backgroundrb-devel mailing list >>> Backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org >>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Let them talk of their oriental summer climes of everlasting >> conservatories; give me the privilege of making my own summer with my >> own coals. >> >> http://gnufied.org >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/backgroundrb-devel/attachments/20080522/0de0774c/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 08:34:37 -0500 > From: "Jim Salinas" <salinas.j at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Backgroundrb-devel] Does backgroundrb support SSL? > To: "Ryan Leavengood" <leavengood at gmail.com> > Cc: backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <834fa2620805220634q6f0284e2y9c4ad575868451c3 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I planned on pushing only database record IDs to the server, but > maybe I > could encrypt/decrypt those IDs when sending them over the wire. From > looking at the server source, it is utilizing TCPSocket, so there is > an > opportunity I believe to layer SSL. Given some time, I''ll > investigate this > further, as this seems to be a better solution in the long run in my > opinion. -Jim > > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Ryan Leavengood <leavengood at gmail.com > > > wrote: > >> On 5/21/08, Jim Salinas <salinas.j at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks for replay David, I just did a search and only found a >>> mention of >> drb >>> in a unit test and from digging around backgroundrb seems to have >>> been >>> rewritten recently without drb. If this incorrect, someone please >>> correct >>> me. :-) >> >> BackgrounDRb has not used DRb for sometime, the name is just a bit >> misleading now ;) >> >> It was switched to use a event framework a while ago and more >> recently >> has switched to the pure Ruby ''packet'' library. >> >> As far as I can tell packet does not support SSL, but I am far from >> an >> expert on the subject. I assume you have some sensitive data you need >> to pass to BackgrounDRb from Rails that you don''t want in the clear? >> >> Maybe you could just use the database to pass that information, only >> passing database IDs or unique tokens to BackgrounDRb for it to load >> the information. Of course depending on your database the information >> may still get passed around in the clear... >> >> Ryan >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/backgroundrb-devel/attachments/20080522/dc11844f/attachment.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Backgroundrb-devel mailing list > Backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel > > End of Backgroundrb-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 7 > *************************************************
Reasonably Related Threads
Wisdom of the Ancients
