On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:35:52 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> 100 is debian default for users > And as far i remember stefhan uses debian. >Yes, I know that, but I also know that it is usually only used on a DC, is an xidNumber and wont work on a Unix domain member, unless, for some unknown reason, Domain Users id given the gidNumber '100' Rowland
Am 2017-09-25 um 16:49 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:35:52 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> 100 is debian default for users >> And as far i remember stefhan uses debian. >> > > Yes, I know that, but I also know that it is usually only used on a DC, > is an xidNumber and wont work on a Unix domain member, unless, for some > unknown reason, Domain Users id given the gidNumber '100'I can't remember any decision for a gidNumber '100'. This funny domain was converted from NT4 back then via classic upgrade, I bugged you and the list for weeks back then ;-) Maybe this is some legacy from then?
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:01:09 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> Am 2017-09-25 um 16:49 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:35:52 +0200 > > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> 100 is debian default for users > >> And as far i remember stefhan uses debian. > >> > > > > Yes, I know that, but I also know that it is usually only used on a > > DC, is an xidNumber and wont work on a Unix domain member, unless, > > for some unknown reason, Domain Users id given the gidNumber '100' > > I can't remember any decision for a gidNumber '100'. > > This funny domain was converted from NT4 back then via classic > upgrade, I bugged you and the list for weeks back then ;-) > > Maybe this is some legacy from then? > >Not sure, run this on both the DC and the DM: getent group "Domain Users" | awk -F ':' '{print $3}' You should get the same number. Rowland