On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 06:56:32 +1300 Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 13:17 -0400, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > > On 11/3/2016 12:07 PM, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > > > > > > Hi Bob, > > > > > > Am 03.11.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > > > > > > > > I have seen you state this before that "server services" line > > > > within a > > > > smb.conf file is not necessary on a DC. > > > > > > > > I have to ask, and it may have been asked before but, I recently > > > > install > > > > from source the v4.5.0 and during provisioning samba created > > > > that "line" > > > > within the smb.conf file. > > > > > > > > I understand what and why your saying this but, if the line is > > > > not > > > > needed then why does provisioning a ADDC create the line? > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_I_Do_Not_Have_a_server_ser > > > vices_parameter_in_My_smb.conf_File.3F > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_Disable_Some_of_the_serv > > > er_services_options_in_the_smb.conf_File.3F > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Marc > > > > > > > > Marc, > > > > Is this correct from the wiki? > > > > "If you are running Samba 4.2 or later, you can disable the |samba| > > internal |winbindd| daemon and switch to the recommended |winbind| > > daemon. To switch, set:" > > > > I thought winbindd was preferred over winbind? > > It doens't matter. I made them an alias for each other when I dropped > the internal winbind for 4.2. (I don't like breaking config files, > and the generated line with all the values listed wasn't intentional. > It was meant to be printed as "server services = -dns" or omitted, > but some magic got in the way and now we are a bit stuck. > > Andrew Bartlett >Hi Andrew, Pardon ??? The guy was asking about 'winbindd' & 'winbind' and you seem to be talking about dns. In answer to lingpanda101, the wiki is correct, but could be worded better, 'winbind' isn't recommended over 'winbindd'. Rowland
On 11/3/2016 2:03 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:> On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 06:56:32 +1300 > Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 13:17 -0400, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: >>> On 11/3/2016 12:07 PM, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: >>>> Hi Bob, >>>> >>>> Am 03.11.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: >>>>> I have seen you state this before that "server services" line >>>>> within a >>>>> smb.conf file is not necessary on a DC. >>>>> >>>>> I have to ask, and it may have been asked before but, I recently >>>>> install >>>>> from source the v4.5.0 and during provisioning samba created >>>>> that "line" >>>>> within the smb.conf file. >>>>> >>>>> I understand what and why your saying this but, if the line is >>>>> not >>>>> needed then why does provisioning a ADDC create the line? >>>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_I_Do_Not_Have_a_server_ser >>>> vices_parameter_in_My_smb.conf_File.3F >>>> >>>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_Disable_Some_of_the_serv >>>> er_services_options_in_the_smb.conf_File.3F >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Marc >>>> >>>> >>> Marc, >>> >>> Is this correct from the wiki? >>> >>> "If you are running Samba 4.2 or later, you can disable the |samba| >>> internal |winbindd| daemon and switch to the recommended |winbind| >>> daemon. To switch, set:" >>> >>> I thought winbindd was preferred over winbind? >> It doens't matter. I made them an alias for each other when I dropped >> the internal winbind for 4.2. (I don't like breaking config files, >> and the generated line with all the values listed wasn't intentional. >> It was meant to be printed as "server services = -dns" or omitted, >> but some magic got in the way and now we are a bit stuck. >> >> Andrew Bartlett >> > Hi Andrew, > > Pardon ??? > > The guy was asking about 'winbindd' & 'winbind' and you seem to be > talking about dns. > > In answer to lingpanda101, the wiki is correct, but could be worded > better, 'winbind' isn't recommended over 'winbindd'. > > Rowland >Rowland, That's what I meant. It sounded as if winbind was preferred over winbindd. Thanks for the clarification. -- - James
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 14:15:57 -0400 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> On 11/3/2016 2:03 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 06:56:32 +1300 > > Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 13:17 -0400, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > >>> On 11/3/2016 12:07 PM, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > >>>> Hi Bob, > >>>> > >>>> Am 03.11.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > >>>>> I have seen you state this before that "server services" line > >>>>> within a > >>>>> smb.conf file is not necessary on a DC. > >>>>> > >>>>> I have to ask, and it may have been asked before but, I recently > >>>>> install > >>>>> from source the v4.5.0 and during provisioning samba created > >>>>> that "line" > >>>>> within the smb.conf file. > >>>>> > >>>>> I understand what and why your saying this but, if the line is > >>>>> not > >>>>> needed then why does provisioning a ADDC create the line? > >>>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_I_Do_Not_Have_a_server_ser > >>>> vices_parameter_in_My_smb.conf_File.3F > >>>> > >>>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_Disable_Some_of_the_serv > >>>> er_services_options_in_the_smb.conf_File.3F > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Marc > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Marc, > >>> > >>> Is this correct from the wiki? > >>> > >>> "If you are running Samba 4.2 or later, you can disable the > >>> |samba| internal |winbindd| daemon and switch to the recommended > >>> |winbind| daemon. To switch, set:" > >>> > >>> I thought winbindd was preferred over winbind? > >> It doens't matter. I made them an alias for each other when I > >> dropped the internal winbind for 4.2. (I don't like breaking > >> config files, and the generated line with all the values listed > >> wasn't intentional. It was meant to be printed as "server services > >> = -dns" or omitted, but some magic got in the way and now we are a > >> bit stuck. > >> > >> Andrew Bartlett > >> > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Pardon ??? > > > > The guy was asking about 'winbindd' & 'winbind' and you seem to be > > talking about dns. > > > > In answer to lingpanda101, the wiki is correct, but could be worded > > better, 'winbind' isn't recommended over 'winbindd'. > > > > Rowland > > > > Rowland, > > That's what I meant. It sounded as if winbind was preferred over > winbindd. Thanks for the clarification. >I have altered the wiki page, it now says that you can change from the recommended 'winbindd' to the older 'winbind' Rowland