On 11/3/2016 12:07 PM, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote:> Hi Bob, > > Am 03.11.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: >> I have seen you state this before that "server services" line within a >> smb.conf file is not necessary on a DC. >> >> I have to ask, and it may have been asked before but, I recently install >> from source the v4.5.0 and during provisioning samba created that "line" >> within the smb.conf file. >> >> I understand what and why your saying this but, if the line is not >> needed then why does provisioning a ADDC create the line? > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_I_Do_Not_Have_a_server_services_parameter_in_My_smb.conf_File.3F > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_Disable_Some_of_the_server_services_options_in_the_smb.conf_File.3F > > > Regards, > Marc > >Marc, Is this correct from the wiki? "If you are running Samba 4.2 or later, you can disable the |samba| internal |winbindd| daemon and switch to the recommended |winbind| daemon. To switch, set:" I thought winbindd was preferred over winbind? -- - James
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 13:17 -0400, lingpanda101 via samba wrote:> On 11/3/2016 12:07 PM, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > > > > Hi Bob, > > > > Am 03.11.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > > > > > > I have seen you state this before that "server services" line > > > within a > > > smb.conf file is not necessary on a DC. > > > > > > I have to ask, and it may have been asked before but, I recently > > > install > > > from source the v4.5.0 and during provisioning samba created that > > > "line" > > > within the smb.conf file. > > > > > > I understand what and why your saying this but, if the line is > > > not > > > needed then why does provisioning a ADDC create the line? > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_I_Do_Not_Have_a_server_ser > > vices_parameter_in_My_smb.conf_File.3F > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_Disable_Some_of_the_serv > > er_services_options_in_the_smb.conf_File.3F > > > > > > Regards, > > Marc > > > > > Marc, > > Is this correct from the wiki? > > "If you are running Samba 4.2 or later, you can disable the |samba| > internal |winbindd| daemon and switch to the recommended |winbind| > daemon. To switch, set:" > > I thought winbindd was preferred over winbind?It doens't matter. I made them an alias for each other when I dropped the internal winbind for 4.2. (I don't like breaking config files, and the generated line with all the values listed wasn't intentional. It was meant to be printed as "server services = -dns" or omitted, but some magic got in the way and now we are a bit stuck. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 06:56:32 +1300 Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 13:17 -0400, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > > On 11/3/2016 12:07 PM, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > > > > > > Hi Bob, > > > > > > Am 03.11.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > > > > > > > > I have seen you state this before that "server services" line > > > > within a > > > > smb.conf file is not necessary on a DC. > > > > > > > > I have to ask, and it may have been asked before but, I recently > > > > install > > > > from source the v4.5.0 and during provisioning samba created > > > > that "line" > > > > within the smb.conf file. > > > > > > > > I understand what and why your saying this but, if the line is > > > > not > > > > needed then why does provisioning a ADDC create the line? > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_I_Do_Not_Have_a_server_ser > > > vices_parameter_in_My_smb.conf_File.3F > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_Disable_Some_of_the_serv > > > er_services_options_in_the_smb.conf_File.3F > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Marc > > > > > > > > Marc, > > > > Is this correct from the wiki? > > > > "If you are running Samba 4.2 or later, you can disable the |samba| > > internal |winbindd| daemon and switch to the recommended |winbind| > > daemon. To switch, set:" > > > > I thought winbindd was preferred over winbind? > > It doens't matter. I made them an alias for each other when I dropped > the internal winbind for 4.2. (I don't like breaking config files, > and the generated line with all the values listed wasn't intentional. > It was meant to be printed as "server services = -dns" or omitted, > but some magic got in the way and now we are a bit stuck. > > Andrew Bartlett >Hi Andrew, Pardon ??? The guy was asking about 'winbindd' & 'winbind' and you seem to be talking about dns. In answer to lingpanda101, the wiki is correct, but could be worded better, 'winbind' isn't recommended over 'winbindd'. Rowland