Cruisecontrolrb users - Apr 2008 - Changes to source control and bug tracking

Dear all,

I have a couple of things to announce:

1. CruiseControl.rb source code has been moved from Subversion to Git
[git://rubyforge.org/cruisecontrolrb.git]. This should make it much
easier for people to maintain their own forks of this codebase. So, if
you have to hack CC.rb, a good way to do it now is to clone the
central git repository; make your changes on a local branch and merge
with master whenever it makes sense to do.

2. Bug tracking has been moved to Lighthouse
[http://cruisecontrolrb.lighthouseapp.com], with all it''s Web 2.0
goodness. Among other things, this means we have a wiki now.

-- 
Alexey Verkhovsky
CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com]
RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com]

Does this mean ccrb will have git support in the official branch?

-Ben

On 4/28/08, Alexey Verkhovsky <alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have a couple of things to announce:
>
> 1. CruiseControl.rb source code has been moved from Subversion to Git
> [git://rubyforge.org/cruisecontrolrb.git]. This should make it much
> easier for people to maintain their own forks of this codebase. So, if
> you have to hack CC.rb, a good way to do it now is to clone the
> central git repository; make your changes on a local branch and merge
> with master whenever it makes sense to do.
>
> 2. Bug tracking has been moved to Lighthouse
> [http://cruisecontrolrb.lighthouseapp.com], with all it''s Web 2.0
> goodness. Among other things, this means we have a wiki now.
>
>
> --
> Alexey Verkhovsky
> CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com]
> RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com]
> _______________________________________________
> Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
> Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/attachments/20080430/03b73758/attachment.html>

that''s what alexey is working on right now.  it''s not there
yet, though.

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Ben Burkert <ben at benburkert.com>
wrote:
> Does this mean ccrb will have git support in the official branch?
>
> -Ben
>
>
> On 4/28/08, Alexey Verkhovsky <alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I have a couple of things to announce:
> >
> > 1. CruiseControl.rb source code has been moved from Subversion to Git
> > [git://rubyforge.org/cruisecontrolrb.git]. This should make it much
> > easier for people to maintain their own forks of this codebase. So, if
> > you have to hack CC.rb, a good way to do it now is to clone the
> > central git repository; make your changes on a local branch and merge
> > with master whenever it makes sense to do.
> >
> > 2. Bug tracking has been moved to Lighthouse
> > [http://cruisecontrolrb.lighthouseapp.com], with all it''s Web
2.0
> > goodness. Among other things, this means we have a wiki now.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexey Verkhovsky
> > CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com]
> > RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
> > Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
> Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/attachments/20080430/87603f11/attachment-0001.html>

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Ben Burkert <ben at benburkert.com>
wrote:
> Does this mean ccrb will have git support in the official branch?
Oh, yes. We are a CI tool project without our own CI loop at the
moment, and we can''[t let it stay that way, can we?
By the way, it''s really sad, but I couldn''t simply merge in
your fork
- can''t have binary dependencies in a shrink-wrapped product.

-- 
Alexey Verkhovsky
CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com]
RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com]

I assume you''re talking about grit?  I don''t think it has any
C extensions,
so you should be able to vendor it without a problem.

-Ben

On 4/30/08, Alexey Verkhovsky <alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Ben Burkert <ben at benburkert.com>
wrote:
>
> > Does this mean ccrb will have git support in the official branch?
>
>
> Oh, yes. We are a CI tool project without our own CI loop at the
> moment, and we can''[t let it stay that way, can we?
> By the way, it''s really sad, but I couldn''t simply merge
in your fork
> - can''t have binary dependencies in a shrink-wrapped product.
>
>
> --
>
> Alexey Verkhovsky
> CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com]
> RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com]
> _______________________________________________
> Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
> Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/attachments/20080430/cdcb34a0/attachment.html>

Can we get an ETA on git support?  There''s a couple big projects that
want
to use it.

-Ben

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Ben Burkert <ben at benburkert.com>
wrote:
> I assume you''re talking about grit?  I don''t think it has
any C
> extensions, so you should be able to vendor it without a problem.
>
> -Ben
>
>
> On 4/30/08, Alexey Verkhovsky <alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Ben Burkert <ben at
benburkert.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Does this mean ccrb will have git support in the official branch?
> >
> >
> > Oh, yes. We are a CI tool project without our own CI loop at the
> > moment, and we can''[t let it stay that way, can we?
> > By the way, it''s really sad, but I couldn''t simply
merge in your fork
> > - can''t have binary dependencies in a shrink-wrapped product.
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Alexey Verkhovsky
> > CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com]
> > RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
> > Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/attachments/20080501/91198737/attachment.html>