On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 15:05 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:> Am 2016-03-23 um 10:06 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: > > Did you also remove : KB2992611 ? > > not yet, no. I will be there again next week and also try that. > The registry entry mentioned by Andrew did not help today ...If that doesn't help, then you need to upgrade to Samba as an AD DC. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
Am 2016-03-23 um 20:06 schrieb Andrew Bartlett:> On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 15:05 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >> Am 2016-03-23 um 10:06 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: >>> Did you also remove : KB2992611 ? >> >> not yet, no. I will be there again next week and also try that. >> The registry entry mentioned by Andrew did not help today ... > > If that doesn't help, then you need to upgrade to Samba as an AD DC.Now *that* sounds scary ;-)
Am 2016-03-23 um 20:12 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:>> If that doesn't help, then you need to upgrade to Samba as an AD DC. > > Now *that* sounds scary ;-)Is the step from NT4-based domain on 3.6.x to ADS-based domain on 4.x a very risky and complicated one or should it be rather standard procedure? Can it be tested and prepared in a way?