I normally run "make -f admin/Makefile.common dist" to re-generate
Makefile.in''s, instead of "make -f admin/Makefile.common"
alone (which
is in debian/rules) since I''ve found that the latter puts lots of
changes like this in the .diff.gz:
- $(AUTOMAKE) --foreign doc/kuickshow/Makefile
+ $(AUTOMAKE) --gnu doc/kuickshow/Makefile
I always meant to add ''dist'' to debian/rules, perhaps we
could do it
in the next round of uploads? (but in the next round for all packages,
please don''t update half of them now since it confuses me :P).
--=20
Adeodato Sim=F3
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
=20
Q: How do Debian developers play Russian rulette?
A: Everone contributes a key revocation certificate and chooses a number
=66rom one to ten. Then everybody executes a random generator - if it''s
a
match, then his revocation certificate is submitted to the keyservers.
-- seen on debian-curiosa@l.d.o
Christopher Martin
2004-Dec-20 15:25 UTC
[Pkg-kde-talk] make -f admin/Makefile.common dist
On December 19, 2004 21:59, Adeodato Sim=F3 wrote:> I normally run "make -f admin/Makefile.common dist" to re-generate > Makefile.in''s, instead of "make -f admin/Makefile.common" alone > (which is in debian/rules) since I''ve found that the latter puts lots > of changes like this in the .diff.gz: > > - $(AUTOMAKE) --foreign doc/kuickshow/Makefile > + $(AUTOMAKE) --gnu doc/kuickshow/Makefile > > I always meant to add ''dist'' to debian/rules, perhaps we could do it > in the next round of uploads? (but in the next round for all > packages, please don''t update half of them now since it confuses me > :P).OK, I''ll keep that in mind for the next round. Chris