dovecot - Sep 2015 - Is it a bug when you move mail between namespaces....

should fts_autoindex handle that case?


On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
> On 09/08/2015 12:56 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > that the fts data gets lost?
>
> All full text search backends are now implemented so that if you
> copy/move mails, the mails need to be indexed again the destination folder.
>
> Alternative would be to index mails only with their GUIDs and have a
> GUID => { folder GUID, IMAP UID } mapping and filter the mails based on
> that. But such reverse index doesn't exist quite yet.
>


-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c)     E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com
US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961

It should.
> On 08 Sep 2015, at 01:01, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com>
wrote:
> 
> should fts_autoindex handle that case?
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi
<mailto:tss at iki.fi>> wrote:
> On 09/08/2015 12:56 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > that the fts data gets lost?
> 
> All full text search backends are now implemented so that if you
> copy/move mails, the mails need to be indexed again the destination folder.
> 
> Alternative would be to index mails only with their GUIDs and have a
> GUID => { folder GUID, IMAP UID } mapping and filter the mails based on
> that. But such reverse index doesn't exist quite yet.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
<http://www.lerctr.org/~ler>
> Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c)     E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com
<mailto:larryrtx at gmail.com>
> US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961

It doesn't in my current 2.2.18 setup with the config I posted.


On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
> It should.
>
> On 08 Sep 2015, at 01:01, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> should fts_autoindex handle that case?
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> On 09/08/2015 12:56 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> > that the fts data gets lost?
>>
>> All full text search backends are now implemented so that if you
>> copy/move mails, the mails need to be indexed again the destination
>> folder.
>>
>> Alternative would be to index mails only with their GUIDs and have a
>> GUID => { folder GUID, IMAP UID } mapping and filter the mails based
on
>> that. But such reverse index doesn't exist quite yet.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
> Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c)     E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com
> US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
>
>
>

-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c)     E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com
US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961