-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote:> Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get > this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat > continues to push out updates even. E.g. > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html >that looks like Supplementary content - we've never had that before. what we might need to do here is work the upstream beyond Red Hat where this works done, that makes it Supplementary content and not completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that might be ? regards - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXFOdwAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtbnEH/01QLHrK59zUEiOuBCpDIXtX 1R6NwHp+9wDait8fx1nCydtZN+FSaXLeiOZC1JG+cT8ItOOj5c5iD6pIxp2FJkg1 psBl/Ym6MMJkhTH3ZlRdy6+jsJANy04lfQz4mdkcYqMI6x9++pfoCHLEajatZlPm Aq9CbUtvxvb8Vu3vnhdYbS5JvqTN2InIoGh62BJRuPVApMMkQgS1eQOfBnBk34dT 4zJT2t9afMHlr29s5gqWa8jh/LAx7BuNJu64m6k4wraku9sIqb4WlGDCK9Chq3zQ 5zbEHviYRF6N+DEfjsqEN+xxbrvanjEG140TXxmnplNdbLORFL7KsJg4P/U49js=hGM4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org> wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get > > this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat > > continues to push out updates even. E.g. > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html > > > > that looks like Supplementary content - we've never had that before. > > what we might need to do here is work the upstream beyond Red Hat > where this works done, that makes it Supplementary content and not > completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that > might be ? > > regards > > - -- > Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS ProjectI suspect it has to do with their "pepperflash" flash plugin. Clearly flash is on the way out, so any support for it is not necessary. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
On 04/18/2016 09:06 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get >>> this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat >>> continues to push out updates even. E.g. >>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html >>> >> >> that looks like Supplementary content - we've never had that before. >> >> what we might need to do here is work the upstream beyond Red Hat >> where this works done, that makes it Supplementary content and not >> completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that >> might be ? >> >> regards >> >> - -- >> Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project > > > I suspect it has to do with their "pepperflash" flash plugin. > > Clearly flash is on the way out, so any support for it is not necessary. >It is indeed not completely open source. I was told that the agreement between Red Hat and Google only allows the RPMs for RHEL to be released to subscribers on the supplemental channel. Sorry, but I can't release it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160418/b19843de/attachment-0001.sig>