thr3ads.net - Libguestfs - [Libguestfs] [PATCH] Reserve entries to tsk

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Matteo Cafasso

2016-Jun-28 19:49 UTC

[Libguestfs] [PATCH] Reserve entries to tsk_dirent struct

Already implemented entries.

tsk_inode
tsk_type
tsk_size
tsk_name
tsk_flags

Easy ones to add.

tsk_atime_sec
tsk_atime_nsec
tsk_mtime_sec
tsk_mtime_nsec
tsk_ctime_sec
tsk_ctime_nsec
tsk_blksize
tsk_blocks

Further ideas.

tsk_nlink
tsk_link_name

Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso <noxdafox@gmail.com>
---
 daemon/tsk.c                      |  4 +++-
 generator/structs.ml              |  6 ++++++
 tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/daemon/tsk.c b/daemon/tsk.c
index 65159ad..446213e 100644
--- a/daemon/tsk.c
+++ b/daemon/tsk.c
@@ -128,7 +128,9 @@ fswalk_callback (TSK_FS_FILE *fsfile, const char *path, void
*data)
   dirent.tsk_name = fname;
   dirent.tsk_flags = file_flags (fsfile);
   dirent.tsk_spare1 = dirent.tsk_spare2 = dirent.tsk_spare3 -   
dirent.tsk_spare4 = dirent.tsk_spare5 = 0;
+    dirent.tsk_spare4 = dirent.tsk_spare5 = dirent.tsk_spare6 +   
dirent.tsk_spare7 = dirent.tsk_spare8 = dirent.tsk_spare9 +   
dirent.tsk_spare10 = dirent.tsk_spare11 = 0;

   ret = send_dirent_info (&dirent);
   ret = (ret == 0) ? TSK_WALK_CONT : TSK_WALK_ERROR;
diff --git a/generator/structs.ml b/generator/structs.ml
index acc0661..eb8931f 100644
--- a/generator/structs.ml
+++ b/generator/structs.ml
@@ -459,6 +459,12 @@ let structs = [
     "tsk_spare3", FInt64;
     "tsk_spare4", FInt64;
     "tsk_spare5", FInt64;
+    "tsk_spare6", FInt64;
+    "tsk_spare7", FInt64;
+    "tsk_spare8", FInt64;
+    "tsk_spare9", FInt64;
+    "tsk_spare10", FInt64;
+    "tsk_spare11", FInt64;
     ];
     s_camel_name = "TSKDirent" };

diff --git a/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
b/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
index c816267..6ee3f71 100755
--- a/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
+++ b/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
@@ -55,7 +55,13 @@ tsk_spare1: 0
 tsk_spare2: 0
 tsk_spare3: 0
 tsk_spare4: 0
-tsk_spare5: 0 }'
+tsk_spare5: 0
+tsk_spare6: 0
+tsk_spare7: 0
+tsk_spare8: 0
+tsk_spare9: 0
+tsk_spare10: 0
+tsk_spare11: 0 }'
 if [ $? != 0 ]; then
     echo "$0: \$MFT not found in files list."
     echo "File list:"
@@ -73,7 +79,13 @@ tsk_spare1: 0
 tsk_spare2: 0
 tsk_spare3: 0
 tsk_spare4: 0
-tsk_spare5: 0 }'
+tsk_spare5: 0
+tsk_spare6: 0
+tsk_spare7: 0
+tsk_spare8: 0
+tsk_spare9: 0
+tsk_spare10: 0
+tsk_spare11: 0 }'
 if [ $? != 0 ]; then
     echo "$0: /test.txt not found in files list."
     echo "File list:"
--
2.8.1

Richard W.M. Jones

2016-Jun-28 20:01 UTC

head link

Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] Reserve entries to tsk_dirent struct

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:49:16PM +0300, Matteo Cafasso
wrote:> Already implemented entries.
> 
> tsk_inode
> tsk_type
> tsk_size
> tsk_name
> tsk_flags
> 
> Easy ones to add.
> 
> tsk_atime_sec
> tsk_atime_nsec
> tsk_mtime_sec
> tsk_mtime_nsec
> tsk_ctime_sec
> tsk_ctime_nsec
> tsk_blksize
> tsk_blocks
> 
> Further ideas.
> 
> tsk_nlink
> tsk_link_name
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso <noxdafox@gmail.com>
> ---
>  daemon/tsk.c                      |  4 +++-
>  generator/structs.ml              |  6 ++++++
>  tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/daemon/tsk.c b/daemon/tsk.c
> index 65159ad..446213e 100644
> --- a/daemon/tsk.c
> +++ b/daemon/tsk.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,9 @@ fswalk_callback (TSK_FS_FILE *fsfile, const char *path,
void *data)
>    dirent.tsk_name = fname;
>    dirent.tsk_flags = file_flags (fsfile);
>    dirent.tsk_spare1 = dirent.tsk_spare2 = dirent.tsk_spare3 > -   
dirent.tsk_spare4 = dirent.tsk_spare5 = 0;
> +    dirent.tsk_spare4 = dirent.tsk_spare5 = dirent.tsk_spare6 > +   
dirent.tsk_spare7 = dirent.tsk_spare8 = dirent.tsk_spare9 > +   
dirent.tsk_spare10 = dirent.tsk_spare11 = 0;
> 
>    ret = send_dirent_info (&dirent);
>    ret = (ret == 0) ? TSK_WALK_CONT : TSK_WALK_ERROR;
> diff --git a/generator/structs.ml b/generator/structs.ml
> index acc0661..eb8931f 100644
> --- a/generator/structs.ml
> +++ b/generator/structs.ml
> @@ -459,6 +459,12 @@ let structs = [
>      "tsk_spare3", FInt64;
>      "tsk_spare4", FInt64;
>      "tsk_spare5", FInt64;
> +    "tsk_spare6", FInt64;
> +    "tsk_spare7", FInt64;
> +    "tsk_spare8", FInt64;
> +    "tsk_spare9", FInt64;
> +    "tsk_spare10", FInt64;
> +    "tsk_spare11", FInt64;
>      ];
>      s_camel_name = "TSKDirent" };
> 
> diff --git a/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
b/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
> index c816267..6ee3f71 100755
> --- a/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
> +++ b/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
> @@ -55,7 +55,13 @@ tsk_spare1: 0
>  tsk_spare2: 0
>  tsk_spare3: 0
>  tsk_spare4: 0
> -tsk_spare5: 0 }'
> +tsk_spare5: 0
> +tsk_spare6: 0
> +tsk_spare7: 0
> +tsk_spare8: 0
> +tsk_spare9: 0
> +tsk_spare10: 0
> +tsk_spare11: 0 }'
>  if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>      echo "$0: \$MFT not found in files list."
>      echo "File list:"
> @@ -73,7 +79,13 @@ tsk_spare1: 0
>  tsk_spare2: 0
>  tsk_spare3: 0
>  tsk_spare4: 0
> -tsk_spare5: 0 }'
> +tsk_spare5: 0
> +tsk_spare6: 0
> +tsk_spare7: 0
> +tsk_spare8: 0
> +tsk_spare9: 0
> +tsk_spare10: 0
> +tsk_spare11: 0 }'
>  if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>      echo "$0: /test.txt not found in files list."
>      echo "File list:"

First a note: This patch is only valid because we have not yet
released this API in a stable release of libguestfs.  After an API
becomes stable we never change it.

I'm a bit confused - what is the aim of this patch?  Is it to reserve
fields we might implement in future, and if so, why don't we just
implement them now?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

noxdafox

2016-Jun-28 20:59 UTC

head link

Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] Reserve entries to tsk_dirent struct

On 28/06/16 23:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:49:16PM +0300, Matteo Cafasso wrote:
>> Already implemented entries.
>>
>> tsk_inode
>> tsk_type
>> tsk_size
>> tsk_name
>> tsk_flags
>>
>> Easy ones to add.
>>
>> tsk_atime_sec
>> tsk_atime_nsec
>> tsk_mtime_sec
>> tsk_mtime_nsec
>> tsk_ctime_sec
>> tsk_ctime_nsec
>> tsk_blksize
>> tsk_blocks
>>
>> Further ideas.
>>
>> tsk_nlink
>> tsk_link_name
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso <noxdafox@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   daemon/tsk.c                      |  4 +++-
>>   generator/structs.ml              |  6 ++++++
>>   tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>   3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/daemon/tsk.c b/daemon/tsk.c
>> index 65159ad..446213e 100644
>> --- a/daemon/tsk.c
>> +++ b/daemon/tsk.c
>> @@ -128,7 +128,9 @@ fswalk_callback (TSK_FS_FILE *fsfile, const char
*path, void *data)
>>     dirent.tsk_name = fname;
>>     dirent.tsk_flags = file_flags (fsfile);
>>     dirent.tsk_spare1 = dirent.tsk_spare2 = dirent.tsk_spare3 >>
-    dirent.tsk_spare4 = dirent.tsk_spare5 = 0;
>> +    dirent.tsk_spare4 = dirent.tsk_spare5 = dirent.tsk_spare6 >>
+    dirent.tsk_spare7 = dirent.tsk_spare8 = dirent.tsk_spare9 >> +   
dirent.tsk_spare10 = dirent.tsk_spare11 = 0;
>>
>>     ret = send_dirent_info (&dirent);
>>     ret = (ret == 0) ? TSK_WALK_CONT : TSK_WALK_ERROR;
>> diff --git a/generator/structs.ml b/generator/structs.ml
>> index acc0661..eb8931f 100644
>> --- a/generator/structs.ml
>> +++ b/generator/structs.ml
>> @@ -459,6 +459,12 @@ let structs = [
>>       "tsk_spare3", FInt64;
>>       "tsk_spare4", FInt64;
>>       "tsk_spare5", FInt64;
>> +    "tsk_spare6", FInt64;
>> +    "tsk_spare7", FInt64;
>> +    "tsk_spare8", FInt64;
>> +    "tsk_spare9", FInt64;
>> +    "tsk_spare10", FInt64;
>> +    "tsk_spare11", FInt64;
>>       ];
>>       s_camel_name = "TSKDirent" };
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
b/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
>> index c816267..6ee3f71 100755
>> --- a/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
>> +++ b/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
>> @@ -55,7 +55,13 @@ tsk_spare1: 0
>>   tsk_spare2: 0
>>   tsk_spare3: 0
>>   tsk_spare4: 0
>> -tsk_spare5: 0 }'
>> +tsk_spare5: 0
>> +tsk_spare6: 0
>> +tsk_spare7: 0
>> +tsk_spare8: 0
>> +tsk_spare9: 0
>> +tsk_spare10: 0
>> +tsk_spare11: 0 }'
>>   if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>>       echo "$0: \$MFT not found in files list."
>>       echo "File list:"
>> @@ -73,7 +79,13 @@ tsk_spare1: 0
>>   tsk_spare2: 0
>>   tsk_spare3: 0
>>   tsk_spare4: 0
>> -tsk_spare5: 0 }'
>> +tsk_spare5: 0
>> +tsk_spare6: 0
>> +tsk_spare7: 0
>> +tsk_spare8: 0
>> +tsk_spare9: 0
>> +tsk_spare10: 0
>> +tsk_spare11: 0 }'
>>   if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>>       echo "$0: /test.txt not found in files list."
>>       echo "File list:"
>
> First a note: This patch is only valid because we have not yet
> released this API in a stable release of libguestfs.  After an API
> becomes stable we never change it.
This is why I am reserving them now.>
> I'm a bit confused - what is the aim of this patch?  Is it to reserve
> fields we might implement in future, and if so, why don't we just
> implement them now?Just to make sure I am now slowing down any stable release.
The patch to add new fields is still a WIP.
If the next stable release due date is still far then you can NACK this 
patch.>
> Rich.
>

Seemingly Similar Threads

Search for more apparently analagous threads

Libguestfs - Jun 2016 - [PATCH] Reserve entries to tsk_dirent struct

[Libguestfs] [PATCH] Reserve entries to tsk_dirent struct

Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] Reserve entries to tsk_dirent struct

Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] Reserve entries to tsk_dirent struct

Seemingly Similar Threads