Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-Apr-06 21:34 UTC
[PATCH v4 06/12] vhost: force spec specified alignment on types
The ring element addresses are passed between components with different alignments assumptions. Thus, if guest/userspace selects a pointer and host then gets and dereferences it, we might need to decrease the compiler-selected alignment to prevent compiler on the host from assuming pointer is aligned. This actually triggers on ARM with -mabi=apcs-gnu - which is a deprecated configuration, but it seems safer to handle this generally. I verified that the produced binary is exactly identical on x86. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 6 +++--- include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h index f8403bd46b85..60cab4c78229 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h @@ -67,9 +67,9 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue { /* The actual ring of buffers. */ struct mutex mutex; unsigned int num; - struct vring_desc __user *desc; - struct vring_avail __user *avail; - struct vring_used __user *used; + vring_desc_t __user *desc; + vring_avail_t __user *avail; + vring_used_t __user *used; const struct vhost_iotlb_map *meta_iotlb[VHOST_NUM_ADDRS]; struct file *kick; struct eventfd_ctx *call_ctx; diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h index 11680e74761a..c3f9ca054250 100644 --- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h +++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h @@ -60,14 +60,32 @@ static inline void virtio_store_mb(bool weak_barriers, struct virtio_device; struct virtqueue; +/* + * The ring element addresses are passed between components with different + * alignments assumptions. Thus, we might need to decrease the compiler-selected + * alignment, and so must use a typedef to make sure the __aligned attribute + * actually takes hold: + * + * https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs//gcc/Common-Type-Attributes.html#Common-Type-Attributes + * + * When used on a struct, or struct member, the aligned attribute can only + * increase the alignment; in order to decrease it, the packed attribute must + * be specified as well. When used as part of a typedef, the aligned attribute + * can both increase and decrease alignment, and specifying the packed + * attribute generates a warning. + */ +typedef struct vring_desc __aligned(VRING_DESC_ALIGN_SIZE) vring_desc_t; +typedef struct vring_avail __aligned(VRING_AVAIL_ALIGN_SIZE) vring_avail_t; +typedef struct vring_used __aligned(VRING_USED_ALIGN_SIZE) vring_used_t; + struct vring { unsigned int num; - struct vring_desc *desc; + vring_desc_t *desc; - struct vring_avail *avail; + vring_avail_t *avail; - struct vring_used *used; + vring_used_t *used; }; /* -- MST
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [PATCH v5 06/12] vhost: force spec specified alignment on types
- [PATCH v6 06/12] vhost: force spec specified alignment on types
- [PATCH v7 10/19] vhost: force spec specified alignment on types
- [PATCH v8 10/19] vhost: force spec specified alignment on types
- [PATCH v4 06/12] vhost: force spec specified alignment on types