Gerd Hoffmann
2019-Aug-13 08:25 UTC
[PATCH 2/2] drm/virtio: notify virtqueues without holding spinlock
Split virtqueue_kick() call into virtqueue_kick_prepare(), which requires serialization, and virtqueue_notify(), which does not. Move the virtqueue_notify() call out of the critical section protected by the queue lock. This avoids triggering a vmexit while holding the lock and thereby fixes a rather bad spinlock contention. Suggested-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe at gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c index ca91e83ffaef..e41c96143342 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_dequeue_cursor_func(struct work_struct *work) wake_up(&vgdev->cursorq.ack_queue); } -static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, +static bool virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf) __releases(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock) __acquires(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock) @@ -260,10 +260,11 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, struct virtqueue *vq = vgdev->ctrlq.vq; struct scatterlist *sgs[3], vcmd, vout, vresp; int outcnt = 0, incnt = 0; + bool notify = false; int ret; if (!vgdev->vqs_ready) - return; + return notify; sg_init_one(&vcmd, vbuf->buf, vbuf->size); sgs[outcnt + incnt] = &vcmd; @@ -292,16 +293,21 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, trace_virtio_gpu_cmd_queue(vq, (struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr *)vbuf->buf); - virtqueue_kick(vq); + notify = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vq); } + return notify; } static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf) { + bool notify; + spin_lock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock); - virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf); + notify = virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf); spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock); + if (notify) + virtqueue_notify(vgdev->ctrlq.vq); } static void virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, @@ -310,6 +316,7 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence) { struct virtqueue *vq = vgdev->ctrlq.vq; + bool notify; again: spin_lock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock); @@ -330,8 +337,10 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, if (fence) virtio_gpu_fence_emit(vgdev, hdr, fence); - virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf); + notify = virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf); spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock); + if (notify) + virtqueue_notify(vgdev->ctrlq.vq); } static void virtio_gpu_queue_cursor(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, @@ -339,6 +348,7 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_cursor(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, { struct virtqueue *vq = vgdev->cursorq.vq; struct scatterlist *sgs[1], ccmd; + bool notify; int ret; int outcnt; @@ -361,10 +371,13 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_cursor(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, trace_virtio_gpu_cmd_queue(vq, (struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr *)vbuf->buf); - virtqueue_kick(vq); + notify = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vq); } spin_unlock(&vgdev->cursorq.qlock); + + if (notify) + virtqueue_notify(vq); } /* just create gem objects for userspace and long lived objects, -- 2.18.1
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [PATCH 1/2] drm/virtio: cleanup queue functions
- [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/virtio: Use vmalloc for command buffer allocations.
- [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/virtio: Use vmalloc for command buffer allocations.
- [PATCH v2] drm/virtio: Use vmalloc for command buffer allocations.
- [PATCH v2] drm/virtio: Use vmalloc for command buffer allocations.